PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWO vs. BKSE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWO vs. BKSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO) and BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF (BKSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWO achieves a 20.41% return, which is significantly lower than BKSE's 22.19% return.


IWO

1D
2.68%
1M
0.41%
6M
14.89%
YTD
20.41%
1Y
33.81%
3Y*
17.15%
5Y*
5.77%
10Y*
10.96%
ALL TIME*
7.07%

BKSE

1D
1.60%
1M
2.69%
6M
15.41%
YTD
22.19%
1Y
36.96%
3Y*
17.60%
5Y*
9.13%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$280.06K$250.83K$246.35K
$179.14M$160.12M$166.50M

IWO vs. BKSE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IWO
iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF
20.41%12.90%15.04%18.51%-26.27%2.54%75.89%
BKSE
BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF
22.19%13.09%9.56%22.37%-18.44%16.18%53.89%

Correlation

The correlation between IWO and BKSE is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2020

0.93

The correlation between IWO and BKSE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

IWO vs. BKSE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IWO
BKSE

Healthcare

28.9%
14.2%

Technology

22.1%
16.0%

Industrials

15.9%
14.9%

Consumer Cyclical

8.2%
13.5%

Financial Services

8.0%
16.4%

Basic Materials

5.0%
4.3%

Energy

4.8%
5.9%

Real Estate

2.4%
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.3%
2.6%

Communication Services

1.9%
2.0%

Utilities

0.6%
3.1%

Healthcare

IWO
28.9%
BKSE
14.2%

Technology

IWO
22.1%
BKSE
16.0%

Industrials

IWO
15.9%
BKSE
14.9%

Consumer Cyclical

IWO
8.2%
BKSE
13.5%

Financial Services

IWO
8.0%
BKSE
16.4%

Basic Materials

IWO
5.0%
BKSE
4.3%

Energy

IWO
4.8%
BKSE
5.9%

Real Estate

IWO
2.4%
BKSE
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

IWO
2.3%
BKSE
2.6%

Communication Services

IWO
1.9%
BKSE
2.0%

Utilities

IWO
0.6%
BKSE
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWO vs. BKSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IWO
IWO Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
IWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWO Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
IWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWO Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

BKSE
BKSE Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
BKSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKSE Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
BKSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKSE Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IWO vs. BKSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO) and BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF (BKSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IWOBKSEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.37

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

3.95

-1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.84

14.18

-6.34

IWO vs. BKSE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWO Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the BKSE Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWO and BKSE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IWO vs. BKSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWO drawdown since its inception was -60.11%, which is greater than BKSE's maximum drawdown of -29.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWO and BKSE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWOBKSEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.11%

-29.08%

-31.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.87%

-9.40%

-5.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.57%

-26.76%

-1.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.51%

-29.08%

-11.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.42%

0.00%

-1.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.62%

-8.84%

-7.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.33%

2.61%

+1.72%

Volatility

IWO vs. BKSE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO) has a higher volatility of 6.69% compared to BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF (BKSE) at 4.07%. This indicates that IWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWOBKSEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.69%

4.07%

+2.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.25%

12.07%

+5.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.51%

17.42%

+5.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.67%

21.37%

+3.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.20%

22.13%

+2.07%

IWO vs. BKSE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWO has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than BKSE's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IWO vs. BKSE - Dividend Comparison

IWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than BKSE's 1.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKSE
BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF
1.17%1.26%1.55%1.38%1.50%1.17%0.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IWO
iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF
0.42%0.56%0.80%0.73%0.73%0.32%0.44%0.71%0.76%0.73%0.97%0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWO and BKSE have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IWO has higher volatility (6.69%) compared to BKSE (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWO dropped -60.11% vs BKSE's -29.08%.

On 5-year performance, BKSE leads with 9.13% vs 5.77% for IWO. On fees, BKSE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BKSE has been the lower-risk option at 4.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BKSE has performed better with a 9.13% return vs 5.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKSE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for IWO.

BKSE has the higher dividend yield at 1.17%, compared with 0.42% for IWO.

IWO tracks Russell 2000 Growth Index, while BKSE tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for IWO and 0.04% for BKSE.

BKSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWO and BKSE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer