IWMY vs. QTUM

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IWMY (Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF) and QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWMY is a Options Trading fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index, while QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IWMY returned 24.81% vs 92.25% for QTUM. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWMY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for QTUM.

Performance

IWMY vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWMY achieves a 13.83% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's 52.13% return.

IWMY

• 1D: 1.41%
• 1M: 2.87%
• YTD: 13.83%
• 6M: 12.08%
• 1Y: 24.81%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QTUM

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: 19.63%
• YTD: 52.13%
• 6M: 48.25%
• 1Y: 92.25%
• 3Y*: 52.13%
• 5Y*: 28.96%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWMY vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
IWMY Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF	13.83%	10.18%	5.56%	9.74%
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	52.13%	36.65%	50.54%	21.31%

Correlation

The correlation between IWMY and QTUM is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2023	0.72

The correlation between IWMY and QTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

IWMY vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWMY

IWMY Risk / Return Rank: 44
IWMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
IWMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
IWMY Omega Ratio Rank: 43
IWMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
IWMY Martin Ratio Rank: 44

QTUM

QTUM Risk / Return Rank: 91
QTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
QTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
QTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 87
QTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
QTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWMY vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IWMY	QTUM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.58	3.53	-1.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.13	4.16	-2.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.54	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.15	6.08	-3.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.08	22.92	-15.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IWMY vs. QTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWMY Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is lower than the QTUM Sharpe Ratio of 3.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWMY and QTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IWMY	QTUM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.58	3.53	-1.95
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.10	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.99	1.07	-0.08

Drawdowns

IWMY vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWMY drawdown since its inception was -18.72%, smaller than the maximum QTUM drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWMY and QTUM.

Drawdown Indicators

	IWMY	QTUM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.72%	-38.45%	+19.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.57%	-15.26%	+3.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-25.39%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.45%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.35%	+1.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.98%	-8.25%	+5.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.51%	4.04%	-0.53%

Volatility

IWMY vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) is 5.37%, while Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a volatility of 9.78%. This indicates that IWMY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IWMY	QTUM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.37%	9.78%	-4.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.69%	20.32%	-7.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.74%	26.27%	-10.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.76%	26.56%	-10.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.76%	27.16%	-11.40%

IWMY vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWMY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

IWMY vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison

IWMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.16%, more than QTUM's 0.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
IWMY Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF	46.16%	63.33%	107.92%	11.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	0.70%	1.01%	0.61%	0.81%	1.46%	0.48%	0.42%	0.61%	0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IWMY and QTUM in my portfolio?

IWMY and QTUM have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IWMY or QTUM?

QTUM has higher volatility (9.78%) compared to IWMY (5.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWMY dropped -18.72% vs QTUM's -38.45%.

Which ETF is better, IWMY or QTUM?

On 1-year performance, QTUM leads with 92.25% vs 24.81% for IWMY. On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, IWMY has been the lower-risk option at 5.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IWMY or QTUM?

Over the 1-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 92.25% return vs 24.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IWMY or QTUM?

QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for IWMY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IWMY or QTUM?

IWMY has the higher dividend yield at 46.16%, compared with 0.70% for QTUM.

What is the main difference between IWMY and QTUM?

IWMY is categorized as Options Trading, while QTUM is Technology Equities. IWMY tracks Russell 2000 Index, while QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for IWMY and 0.40% for QTUM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.53 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.