PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWMY vs. QTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IWMY vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IWMY vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IWMY
Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF
-0.96%10.18%5.56%9.74%
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
-0.14%36.65%50.54%21.31%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWMY achieves a -0.96% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's -0.14% return.


IWMY

1D
0.61%
1M
-5.59%
YTD
-0.96%
6M
-5.14%
1Y
12.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QTUM

1D
1.85%
1M
-6.11%
YTD
-0.14%
6M
3.08%
1Y
47.58%
3Y*
34.18%
5Y*
18.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IWMY vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWMY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IWMY vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWMY
IWMY Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
IWMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWMY Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
IWMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWMY Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

QTUM
QTUM Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
QTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
QTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWMY vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWMYQTUMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.68

1.61

-0.93

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.95

2.24

-1.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.30

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.97

3.16

-2.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.02

11.08

-8.06

IWMY vs. QTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWMY Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the QTUM Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWMY and QTUM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWMYQTUMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

1.61

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.84

-0.19

Correlation

The correlation between IWMY and QTUM is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

IWMY vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison

IWMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 57.52%, more than QTUM's 1.07% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IWMY
Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF
57.52%63.33%107.92%11.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
1.07%1.01%0.61%0.81%1.46%0.48%0.42%0.61%0.21%

Drawdowns

IWMY vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWMY drawdown since its inception was -18.72%, smaller than the maximum QTUM drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWMY and QTUM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IWMYQTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.72%

-38.45%

+19.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.55%

-15.26%

+2.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.98%

-9.34%

+1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.07%

-8.40%

+5.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.04%

4.36%

-0.32%

Volatility

IWMY vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) is 7.26%, while Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a volatility of 9.77%. This indicates that IWMY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IWMYQTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.26%

9.77%

-2.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.32%

20.87%

-8.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.74%

29.70%

-11.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.62%

26.21%

-10.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.62%

27.05%

-11.43%