IWMY vs. COIW

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

IWMY (Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF) and COIW (COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWMY is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Defiance, while COIW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, IWMY returned 17.50% vs -71.21% for COIW. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWMY charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for COIW.

Performance

IWMY vs. COIW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF (IWMY) and COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWMY achieves a 13.63% return, which is significantly higher than COIW's -36.41% return.

IWMY

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: -1.14%
• 6M: 7.05%
• YTD: 13.63%
• 1Y: 17.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.78%

COIW

• 1D: 2.84%
• 1M: -2.39%
• 6M: -41.28%
• YTD: -36.41%
• 1Y: -71.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -41.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWMY vs. COIW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IWMY Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF	13.63%	3.99%
COIW COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF	-36.41%	-25.92%

Correlation

The correlation between IWMY and COIW is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025	0.53

The correlation between IWMY and COIW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

IWMY vs. COIW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWMY

IWMY Risk / Return Rank: 39
IWMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
IWMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
IWMY Omega Ratio Rank: 37
IWMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
IWMY Martin Ratio Rank: 41

COIW

COIW Risk / Return Rank: 2
COIW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
COIW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
COIW Omega Ratio Rank: 2
COIW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
COIW Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWMY vs. COIW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF (IWMY) and COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IWMY	COIW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.09	-0.87	+1.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.55	-1.56	+3.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	0.83	+0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.52	-0.96	+2.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.95	-1.36	+6.31

IWMY vs. COIW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWMY Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is higher than the COIW Sharpe Ratio of -0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWMY and COIW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IWMY vs. COIW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWMY drawdown since its inception was -18.72%, smaller than the maximum COIW drawdown of -75.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWMY and COIW.

Drawdown Indicators

	IWMY	COIW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.72%	-75.01%	+56.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.57%	-74.56%	+62.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.40%	-71.21%	+68.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.89%	-40.96%	+38.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.55%	52.97%	-49.42%

Volatility

IWMY vs. COIW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF (IWMY) is 3.33%, while COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW) has a volatility of 19.87%. This indicates that IWMY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COIW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IWMY	COIW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.33%	19.87%	-16.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.48%	63.94%	-50.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.19%	82.10%	-65.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.80%	89.47%	-73.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.80%	89.47%	-73.67%

IWMY vs. COIW - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWMY has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than COIW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

IWMY vs. COIW - Dividend Comparison

IWMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 42.60%, less than COIW's 227.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
COIW COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF	227.24%	120.37%	0.00%	0.00%
IWMY Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF	42.60%	63.33%	107.92%	11.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IWMY and COIW in my portfolio?

IWMY and COIW have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IWMY or COIW?

COIW has higher volatility (19.87%) compared to IWMY (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWMY dropped -18.72% vs COIW's -75.01%.

Which ETF is better, IWMY or COIW?

On 1-year performance, IWMY leads with 17.50% vs -71.21% for COIW. On fees, COIW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, IWMY has been the lower-risk option at 3.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IWMY or COIW?

Over the 1-year period, IWMY has performed better with a 17.50% return vs -71.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IWMY or COIW?

COIW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for IWMY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IWMY or COIW?

COIW has the higher dividend yield at 227.24%, compared with 42.60% for IWMY.

What is the main difference between IWMY and COIW?

IWMY is categorized as Options Trading, while COIW is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for IWMY and 0.99% for COIW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IWMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.