PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWMY vs. C
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWMY vs. C - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) and Citigroup Inc. (C). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWMY achieves a 13.70% return, which is significantly lower than C's 21.02% return.


IWMY

1D
0.68%
1M
2.79%
YTD
13.70%
6M
10.66%
1Y
21.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

C

1D
1.27%
1M
12.68%
YTD
21.02%
6M
26.32%
1Y
82.79%
3Y*
46.87%
5Y*
16.80%
10Y*
16.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWMY vs. C - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IWMY
Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF
13.70%10.18%5.56%10.06%
C
Citigroup Inc.
21.02%70.38%41.93%33.85%

Correlation

The correlation between IWMY and C is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2023

0.57

The correlation between IWMY and C has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWMY vs. C — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWMY
IWMY Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
IWMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWMY Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
IWMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWMY Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

C
C Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
C Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
C Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
C Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
C Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
C Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWMY vs. C - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) and Citigroup Inc. (C). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IWMYCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.45

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

5.64

-3.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.03

16.25

-10.22

IWMY vs. C - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWMY Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the C Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWMY and C, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IWMY vs. C - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWMY drawdown since its inception was -18.72%, smaller than the maximum C drawdown of -98.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWMY and C.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWMYCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.72%

-98.00%

+79.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.57%

-14.76%

+3.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-62.68%

+62.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.96%

-43.51%

+40.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.54%

5.12%

-1.58%

Volatility

IWMY vs. C - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) is 6.80%, while Citigroup Inc. (C) has a volatility of 8.30%. This indicates that IWMY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than C based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWMYCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.80%

8.30%

-1.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.47%

23.09%

-9.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.36%

28.37%

-12.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.94%

29.20%

-13.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.94%

33.23%

-17.29%

Dividends

IWMY vs. C - Dividend Comparison

IWMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.61%, more than C's 1.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
C
Citigroup Inc.
1.72%1.99%3.10%4.04%4.51%3.38%3.31%2.40%2.96%1.29%0.71%0.31%
IWMY
Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF
44.61%63.33%107.92%11.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWMY and C have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

C has higher volatility (8.30%) compared to IWMY (6.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWMY dropped -18.72% vs C's -98.00%.

C currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWMY and C

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer