IWMO.L vs. IDMO
IWMO.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and IDMO (Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds - IWMO.L tracks the MSCI World Momentum Index while IDMO tracks the S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWMO.L returned 14.86%/yr vs 12.65%/yr for IDMO. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
IWMO.L vs. IDMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWMO.L achieves a 18.37% return, which is significantly higher than IDMO's 10.02% return. Over the past 10 years, IWMO.L has outperformed IDMO with an annualized return of 14.86%, while IDMO has yielded a comparatively lower 12.65% annualized return.
IWMO.L
- 1D
- -2.22%
- 1M
- -5.18%
- 6M
- 15.68%
- YTD
- 18.37%
- 1Y
- 28.99%
- 3Y*
- 25.82%
- 5Y*
- 13.01%
- 10Y*
- 14.86%
IDMO
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- 6M
- 7.03%
- YTD
- 10.02%
- 1Y
- 24.61%
- 3Y*
- 25.56%
- 5Y*
- 15.87%
- 10Y*
- 12.65%
IWMO.L vs. IDMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWMO.L iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 18.37% | 21.04% | 30.50% | 11.96% | -17.97% | 14.13% | 28.58% | 27.14% | -3.85% | 32.09% |
IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF | 10.02% | 42.17% | 12.79% | 20.16% | -12.03% | 14.31% | 22.01% | 26.09% | -16.66% | 29.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWMO.L and IDMO is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2014 | 0.51 |
The correlation between IWMO.L and IDMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (all time) to 0.67 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IWMO.L vs. IDMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWMO.L
IDMO
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Energy
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Technology
IWMO.L
IDMO
Industrials
IWMO.L
IDMO
Financial Services
IWMO.L
IDMO
Energy
IWMO.L
IDMO
Healthcare
IWMO.L
IDMO
Basic Materials
IWMO.L
IDMO
Communication Services
IWMO.L
IDMO
Utilities
IWMO.L
IDMO
Consumer Defensive
IWMO.L
IDMO
Consumer Cyclical
IWMO.L
IDMO
Real Estate
IWMO.L
IDMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWMO.L vs. IDMO — Risk / Return Rank
IWMO.L
IDMO
IWMO.L vs. IDMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWMO.L) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IWMO.L | IDMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.25 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 2.01 | +0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.70 | 7.90 | +1.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IWMO.L vs. IDMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWMO.L drawdown since its inception was -31.52%, smaller than the maximum IDMO drawdown of -39.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWMO.L and IDMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWMO.L | IDMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.52% | -39.38% | +7.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.61% | -12.31% | +0.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.40% | -12.65% | -6.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.63% | -27.07% | -2.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.52% | -31.34% | -0.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.24% | -2.38% | -4.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.00% | -9.70% | +3.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 3.12% | -0.14% |
Volatility
IWMO.L vs. IDMO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWMO.L) has a higher volatility of 8.95% compared to Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) at 5.91%. This indicates that IWMO.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWMO.L | IDMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.95% | 5.91% | +3.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.45% | 16.78% | +1.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.68% | 18.50% | +2.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.99% | 18.13% | +0.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.25% | 17.89% | +0.36% |
IWMO.L vs. IDMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IWMO.L and IDMO have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IWMO.L vs. IDMO - Dividend Comparison
IWMO.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IDMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF | 3.63% | 3.71% | 2.24% | 2.89% | 3.66% | 1.81% | 1.63% | 2.78% | 3.27% | 3.08% | 2.18% | 2.52% |
IWMO.L iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWMO.L and IDMO have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IWMO.L and IDMO have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
IWMO.L tracks MSCI World Momentum Index, while IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco.
Find the right allocation for IWMO.L and IDMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer