IWML vs. NVDL

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Size Factor TR ETN (IWML) and GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL).

IWML and NVDL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IWML is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Index. It was launched on Feb 4, 2021. NVDL is an actively managed fund by GraniteShares. It was launched on Dec 13, 2022.

Performance

IWML vs. NVDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Size Factor TR ETN (IWML) and GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IWML vs. NVDL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
IWML ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Size Factor TR ETN	0.97%	9.64%	15.70%	22.31%	-7.44%
NVDL GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF	-16.23%	32.57%	344.58%	432.18%	-28.32%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWML achieves a 0.97% return, which is significantly higher than NVDL's -16.23% return.

IWML

• 1D: 1.93%
• 1M: -10.49%
• YTD: 0.97%
• 6M: 3.02%
• 1Y: 37.84%
• 3Y*: 15.02%
• 5Y*: -1.97%
• 10Y*: —

NVDL

• 1D: 1.60%
• 1M: -8.86%
• YTD: -16.23%
• 6M: -21.72%
• 1Y: 92.71%
• 3Y*: 118.73%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWML vs. NVDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWML has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than NVDL's 1.15% expense ratio.

NVDL

GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF

IWML

ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Size Factor TR ETN

Return for Risk

IWML vs. NVDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWML

IWML Risk / Return Rank: 43
IWML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
IWML Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
IWML Omega Ratio Rank: 44
IWML Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
IWML Martin Ratio Rank: 44

NVDL

NVDL Risk / Return Rank: 67
NVDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
NVDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
NVDL Omega Ratio Rank: 63
NVDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
NVDL Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWML vs. NVDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Size Factor TR ETN (IWML) and GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IWML	NVDL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.77	1.14	-0.37
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.35	1.90	-0.55
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.24	-0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.26	2.30	-1.04
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.52	5.52	-1.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IWML vs. NVDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWML Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the NVDL Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWML and NVDL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IWML	NVDL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77	1.14	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.04	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.03	1.59	-1.62

Correlation

The correlation between IWML and NVDL is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

IWML vs. NVDL - Dividend Comparison

Neither IWML nor NVDL has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
IWML ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Size Factor TR ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NVDL GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	11.29%

Drawdowns

IWML vs. NVDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWML drawdown since its inception was -60.06%, smaller than the maximum NVDL drawdown of -67.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWML and NVDL.

Drawdown Indicators

	IWML	NVDL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.06%	-67.55%	+7.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.86%	-42.23%	+11.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-60.06%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.20%	-34.75%	+12.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.77%	-17.05%	-15.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.58%	17.61%	-9.03%

Volatility

IWML vs. NVDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Size Factor TR ETN (IWML) is 16.29%, while GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL) has a volatility of 20.66%. This indicates that IWML experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IWML	NVDL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.29%	20.66%	-4.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.01%	51.42%	-21.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.43%	81.87%	-32.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	46.20%	91.12%	-44.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.53%	91.12%	-44.59%