IWML vs. QYLD
Compare and contrast key facts about ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Size Factor TR ETN (IWML) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD).
IWML and QYLD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IWML is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Index. It was launched on Feb 4, 2021. QYLD is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. It was launched on Dec 12, 2013. Both IWML and QYLD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IWML or QYLD.
Key characteristics
| IWML | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 6.72% | 5.96% |
| 1Y Return | 37.17% | 13.48% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -8.20% | 4.79% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.85 | 1.66 |
| Daily Std Dev | 39.38% | 8.11% |
| Max Drawdown | -60.06% | -24.89% |
| Current Drawdown | -35.18% | -1.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWML and QYLD is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
IWML vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IWML achieves a 6.72% return, which is significantly higher than QYLD's 5.96% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IWML vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWML has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IWML vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Size Factor TR ETN (IWML) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IWML vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison
IWML has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.73%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWML ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Size Factor TR ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 11.73% | 11.78% | 13.26% | 12.85% | 11.16% | 9.84% | 12.44% | 7.69% | 9.15% | 9.42% | 10.74% |
Drawdowns
IWML vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWML drawdown since its inception was -60.06%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWML and QYLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IWML vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison
ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Size Factor TR ETN (IWML) has a higher volatility of 9.03% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 2.66%. This indicates that IWML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.