IWML vs. BRKW

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Size Factor TR ETN (IWML) and Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW).

IWML and BRKW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IWML is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Index. It was launched on Feb 4, 2021. BRKW is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Jun 17, 2025.

Performance

IWML vs. BRKW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Size Factor TR ETN (IWML) and Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IWML vs. BRKW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IWML ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Size Factor TR ETN	0.97%	33.07%
BRKW Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF	-6.49%	2.09%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWML achieves a 0.97% return, which is significantly higher than BRKW's -6.49% return.

IWML

• 1D: 1.93%
• 1M: -10.49%
• YTD: 0.97%
• 6M: 3.02%
• 1Y: 37.84%
• 3Y*: 15.02%
• 5Y*: -1.97%
• 10Y*: —

BRKW

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: -0.58%
• YTD: -6.49%
• 6M: -6.66%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWML vs. BRKW - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWML has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than BRKW's 0.99% expense ratio.

BRKW

Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF

IWML

ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Size Factor TR ETN

Return for Risk

IWML vs. BRKW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWML

IWML Risk / Return Rank: 43
IWML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
IWML Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
IWML Omega Ratio Rank: 44
IWML Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
IWML Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWML vs. BRKW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Size Factor TR ETN (IWML) and Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IWML	BRKW	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.77	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.35	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.26	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.52	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IWML	BRKW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.04	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.03	-0.32	+0.29

Correlation

The correlation between IWML and BRKW is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

IWML vs. BRKW - Dividend Comparison

IWML has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BRKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.90%.

	TTM	2025
IWML ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Size Factor TR ETN	0.00%	0.00%
BRKW Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF	20.90%	14.45%

Drawdowns

IWML vs. BRKW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWML drawdown since its inception was -60.06%, which is greater than BRKW's maximum drawdown of -11.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWML and BRKW.

Drawdown Indicators

	IWML	BRKW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.06%	-11.86%	-48.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.86%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-60.06%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.20%	-9.47%	-12.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.77%	-4.29%	-28.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.58%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IWML	BRKW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.29%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.01%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.43%	17.90%	+31.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	46.20%	17.90%	+28.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.53%	17.90%	+28.63%