PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWM vs. IREN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWM vs. IREN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) and IREN Limited (IREN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWM achieves a 19.22% return, which is significantly lower than IREN's 58.25% return.


IWM

1D
0.87%
1M
3.64%
YTD
19.22%
6M
16.00%
1Y
39.16%
3Y*
17.23%
5Y*
6.07%
10Y*
11.27%

IREN

1D
5.40%
1M
8.34%
YTD
58.25%
6M
48.94%
1Y
487.71%
3Y*
155.58%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWM vs. IREN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
19.22%12.66%11.38%16.83%-20.48%-6.64%
IREN
IREN Limited
58.25%284.62%37.34%472.00%-92.27%-42.25%

Correlation

The correlation between IWM and IREN is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2021

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWM vs. IREN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWM
IWM Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
IWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWM Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
IWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

IREN
IREN Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
IREN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IREN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
IREN Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
IREN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
IREN Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWM vs. IREN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) and IREN Limited (IREN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IWMIRENDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.42

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.57

8.39

-4.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.63

15.97

-3.34

IWM vs. IREN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWM Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is lower than the IREN Sharpe Ratio of 4.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWM and IREN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IWM vs. IREN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWM drawdown since its inception was -59.05%, smaller than the maximum IREN drawdown of -96.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWM and IREN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWMIRENDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.05%

-96.21%

+37.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.03%

-58.62%

+47.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.50%

-65.56%

+38.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-21.78%

+21.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.76%

-65.42%

+54.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

30.74%

-27.62%

Volatility

IWM vs. IREN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) is 7.16%, while IREN Limited (IREN) has a volatility of 34.10%. This indicates that IWM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IREN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWMIRENDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.16%

34.10%

-26.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.29%

75.79%

-61.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.73%

103.25%

-83.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.61%

118.61%

-96.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.08%

118.61%

-95.53%

Dividends

IWM vs. IREN - Dividend Comparison

IWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, while IREN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IREN
IREN Limited
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
0.87%1.04%1.15%1.35%1.48%0.94%1.04%1.26%1.40%1.26%1.38%1.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWM and IREN have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IREN has higher volatility (34.10%) compared to IWM (7.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWM dropped -59.05% vs IREN's -96.21%.

IREN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.76 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWM and IREN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer