PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWFQ.L vs. MINT.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWFQ.L vs. MINT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS (IWFQ.L) and PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF (MINT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IWFQ.L is traded in GBp, while MINT.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MINT.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWFQ.L achieves a 10.34% return, which is significantly higher than MINT.L's 1.92% return. Over the past 10 years, IWFQ.L has outperformed MINT.L with an annualized return of 12.21%, while MINT.L has yielded a comparatively lower 2.43% annualized return.


IWFQ.L

1D
-0.35%
1M
0.31%
6M
8.68%
YTD
10.34%
1Y
20.01%
3Y*
15.88%
5Y*
10.66%
10Y*
12.21%

MINT.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.55%
6M
1.49%
YTD
1.92%
1Y
3.41%
3Y*
4.02%
5Y*
3.84%
10Y*
2.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWFQ.L vs. MINT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWFQ.L
iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS
10.34%7.40%18.93%19.15%-9.55%25.17%10.93%25.86%-2.34%12.47%
MINT.L
PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF
1.92%-2.80%7.60%0.43%11.14%0.85%-1.68%-0.65%7.67%-6.94%

Correlation

The correlation between IWFQ.L and MINT.L is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2014

0.26

The correlation between IWFQ.L and MINT.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (5 years) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWFQ.L vs. MINT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWFQ.L
IWFQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
IWFQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWFQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWFQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
IWFQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWFQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

MINT.L
MINT.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MINT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MINT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
MINT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
MINT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
MINT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWFQ.L vs. MINT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS (IWFQ.L) and PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF (MINT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IWFQ.LMINT.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.10

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.84

0.72

+2.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.06

1.97

+10.08

IWFQ.L vs. MINT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWFQ.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the MINT.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWFQ.L and MINT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IWFQ.L vs. MINT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWFQ.L drawdown since its inception was -40.49%, which is greater than MINT.L's maximum drawdown of -15.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWFQ.L and MINT.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWFQ.LMINT.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.49%

-15.69%

-24.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.01%

-5.03%

-1.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.20%

-9.68%

-10.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.20%

-15.65%

-4.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.91%

-15.69%

-8.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.89%

-4.61%

+3.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.92%

-6.12%

-2.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

1.83%

-0.17%

Volatility

IWFQ.L vs. MINT.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS (IWFQ.L) has a higher volatility of 2.57% compared to PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF (MINT.L) at 1.67%. This indicates that IWFQ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWFQ.LMINT.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.57%

1.67%

+0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.40%

5.05%

+2.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.91%

6.57%

+3.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.21%

8.43%

+10.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.26%

8.71%

+8.55%

Dividends

IWFQ.L vs. MINT.L - Dividend Comparison

IWFQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MINT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWFQ.L
iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MINT.L
PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF
4.36%4.43%5.18%4.81%1.51%0.34%1.17%2.63%2.33%1.56%1.31%0.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWFQ.L and MINT.L have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IWFQ.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while MINT.L tracks PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: iShares and PIMCO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWFQ.L and MINT.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer