IWFQ.L vs. G500.L
IWFQ.L (iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS) and G500.L (Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg)) are both Global Equities funds - IWFQ.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD while G500.L tracks the Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IWFQ.L returned 10.66%/yr vs 12.15%/yr for G500.L. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWFQ.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for G500.L.
Performance
IWFQ.L vs. G500.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IWFQ.L having a 10.34% return and G500.L slightly lower at 9.90%.
IWFQ.L
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- 6M
- 8.68%
- YTD
- 10.34%
- 1Y
- 20.01%
- 3Y*
- 15.88%
- 5Y*
- 10.66%
- 10Y*
- 12.21%
G500.L
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -0.03%
- 6M
- 9.49%
- YTD
- 9.90%
- 1Y
- 21.08%
- 3Y*
- 19.63%
- 5Y*
- 12.15%
- 10Y*
- —
IWFQ.L vs. G500.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWFQ.L iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS | 10.34% | 7.40% | 18.93% | 19.15% | -9.55% | 25.17% | 9.80% |
G500.L Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg) | 9.90% | 17.45% | 24.98% | 24.88% | -19.98% | 28.95% | 20.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWFQ.L and G500.L is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2020 | 0.78 |
The correlation between IWFQ.L and G500.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWFQ.L vs. G500.L — Risk / Return Rank
IWFQ.L
G500.L
IWFQ.L vs. G500.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS (IWFQ.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg) (G500.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IWFQ.L | G500.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.33 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.84 | 2.65 | +0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.06 | 10.68 | +1.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IWFQ.L vs. G500.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWFQ.L drawdown since its inception was -40.49%, which is greater than G500.L's maximum drawdown of -25.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWFQ.L and G500.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWFQ.L | G500.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.49% | -25.20% | -15.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.01% | -8.21% | +1.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.20% | -18.22% | -1.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.20% | -25.20% | +5.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.89% | -0.66% | -0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.92% | -5.31% | -3.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.66% | 2.04% | -0.38% |
Volatility
IWFQ.L vs. G500.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS (IWFQ.L) is 2.57%, while Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg) (G500.L) has a volatility of 2.79%. This indicates that IWFQ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than G500.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWFQ.L | G500.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.57% | 2.79% | -0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.40% | 9.28% | -1.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.91% | 12.06% | -2.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.21% | 15.99% | +3.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.26% | 15.87% | +1.39% |
IWFQ.L vs. G500.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWFQ.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than G500.L's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWFQ.L vs. G500.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IWFQ.L nor G500.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IWFQ.L and G500.L have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, G500.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
G500.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IWFQ.L.
IWFQ.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while G500.L tracks Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IWFQ.L and 0.05% for G500.L.
Find the right allocation for IWFQ.L and G500.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer