PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWFM.L vs. XWEM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWFM.L vs. XWEM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IWFM.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWEM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IWFM.L is traded in GBp, while XWEM.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XWEM.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWFM.L achieves a 27.91% return, which is significantly higher than XWEM.L's 24.72% return.


IWFM.L

1D
1.72%
1M
6.70%
YTD
27.91%
6M
27.20%
1Y
41.65%
3Y*
28.63%
5Y*
15.31%
10Y*
16.28%

XWEM.L

1D
0.00%
1M
4.99%
YTD
24.72%
6M
24.34%
1Y
40.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWFM.L vs. XWEM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IWFM.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc)
27.91%12.72%32.62%9.09%
XWEM.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum ESG UCITS ETF 1C
24.72%12.90%31.08%9.26%

Correlation

The correlation between IWFM.L and XWEM.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2023

0.90

The correlation between IWFM.L and XWEM.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWFM.L vs. XWEM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWFM.L
IWFM.L Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
IWFM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWFM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWFM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
IWFM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWFM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

XWEM.L
XWEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
XWEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XWEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XWEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
XWEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
XWEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWFM.L vs. XWEM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IWFM.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWEM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IWFM.LXWEM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.44

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.63

4.37

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.51

17.15

+0.36

IWFM.L vs. XWEM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWFM.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the XWEM.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWFM.L and XWEM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IWFM.L vs. XWEM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWFM.L drawdown since its inception was -41.86%, which is greater than XWEM.L's maximum drawdown of -20.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWFM.L and XWEM.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWFM.LXWEM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.86%

-20.14%

-21.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.95%

-9.26%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.27%

-1.65%

+0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.39%

-2.39%

-7.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.37%

2.37%

0.00%

Volatility

IWFM.L vs. XWEM.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IWFM.L) has a higher volatility of 7.32% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWEM.L) at 5.94%. This indicates that IWFM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XWEM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWFM.LXWEM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.32%

5.94%

+1.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.90%

14.30%

+0.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.43%

17.00%

+0.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.73%

16.81%

+4.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.57%

16.81%

+2.76%

IWFM.L vs. XWEM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IWFM.L and XWEM.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IWFM.L vs. XWEM.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IWFM.L nor XWEM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, IWFM.L and XWEM.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IWFM.L and XWEM.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

IWFM.L is categorized as Momentum, while XWEM.L is Global Equities. IWFM.L tracks MSCI World Momentum Index, while XWEM.L tracks MSCI World Momentum Low Carbon SRI Screened Select. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWFM.L and XWEM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer