PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IWFM.L vs. XDEM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IWFM.L vs. XDEM.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IWFM.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc)) and XDEM.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C) are both Momentum funds tracking the MSCI World Momentum Index, from iShares and DWS respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWFM.L returned 16.44%/yr vs 16.78%/yr for XDEM.L. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.

Performance

IWFM.L vs. XDEM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IWFM.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IWFM.L having a 22.13% return and XDEM.L slightly higher at 22.38%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IWFM.L having a 16.44% annualized return and XDEM.L not far ahead at 16.78%.

IWFM.L

1D
-0.86%
1M
8.93%
YTD
22.13%
6M
22.59%
1Y
35.15%
3Y*
26.24%
5Y*
14.83%
10Y*
16.44%

XDEM.L

1D
-0.65%
1M
9.10%
YTD
22.38%
6M
22.80%
1Y
35.27%
3Y*
26.31%
5Y*
14.93%
10Y*
16.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWFM.L vs. XDEM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWFM.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc)		22.13%12.72%32.62%5.85%-8.21%15.58%24.16%23.25%1.62%20.40%
XDEM.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C		22.38%12.52%32.87%5.88%-8.06%15.61%24.14%23.37%2.28%20.40%

Correlation

The correlation between IWFM.L and XDEM.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2014

0.94

The correlation between IWFM.L and XDEM.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

IWFM.L vs. XDEM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IWFM.L
XDEM.L

Technology

26.0%
34.6%

Industrials

18.7%
20.5%

Financial Services

13.1%
18.9%

Healthcare

10.7%
6.0%

Energy

10.6%
1.8%

Communication Services

6.8%
7.2%

Basic Materials

6.0%
4.9%

Utilities

3.7%
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

1.6%
1.2%

Consumer Defensive

1.5%
1.2%

Real Estate

1.4%
1.0%

Technology

IWFM.L
26.0%
XDEM.L
34.6%

Industrials

IWFM.L
18.7%
XDEM.L
20.5%

Financial Services

IWFM.L
13.1%
XDEM.L
18.9%

Healthcare

IWFM.L
10.7%
XDEM.L
6.0%

Energy

IWFM.L
10.6%
XDEM.L
1.8%

Communication Services

IWFM.L
6.8%
XDEM.L
7.2%

Basic Materials

IWFM.L
6.0%
XDEM.L
4.9%

Utilities

IWFM.L
3.7%
XDEM.L
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

IWFM.L
1.6%
XDEM.L
1.2%

Consumer Defensive

IWFM.L
1.5%
XDEM.L
1.2%

Real Estate

IWFM.L
1.4%
XDEM.L
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc)

Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C

Often compared with IWFM.L:
IWFM.L vs. SPMOIWFM.L vs. XDEM.DEIWFM.L vs. IMTMIWFM.L vs. IUMF.LIWFM.L vs. SPYIWFM.L vs. JPGL.LIWFM.L vs. ACWI
Often compared with XDEM.L:
XDEM.L vs. XDEV.LXDEM.L vs. XDEM.DEXDEM.L vs. VHVG.LXDEM.L vs. MVOL.LXDEM.L vs. XDEB.LXDEM.L vs. EXCS.LXDEM.L vs. IUMF.L

Return for Risk

IWFM.L vs. XDEM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IWFM.L
IWFM.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
IWFM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWFM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWFM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
IWFM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWFM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
XDEM.L
XDEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
XDEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWFM.L vs. XDEM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IWFM.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IWFM.LXDEM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.16
2.17

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.18
3.22

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.40

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.91

3.90

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.27

15.18

+0.08

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IWFM.L vs. XDEM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWFM.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the XDEM.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWFM.L and XDEM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IWFM.LXDEM.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

2.17

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

0.91

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

1.00

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

0.97

+0.01

Drawdowns

IWFM.L vs. XDEM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWFM.L drawdown since its inception was -22.58%, roughly equal to the maximum XDEM.L drawdown of -22.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWFM.L and XDEM.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IWFM.LXDEM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.58%

-22.42%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.95%

-9.01%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.40%

-19.99%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.40%

-20.13%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.58%

-22.42%

-0.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.86%

-0.65%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.94%

-4.99%

+0.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

2.32%

-0.02%

Volatility

IWFM.L vs. XDEM.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IWFM.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.L) have volatilities of 5.85% and 5.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IWFM.LXDEM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.85%

5.84%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.75%

13.78%

-0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.21%

16.17%

+0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.47%

16.41%

+0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.18%

16.80%

+0.38%

IWFM.L vs. XDEM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IWFM.L and XDEM.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IWFM.L vs. XDEM.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IWFM.L nor XDEM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.99, IWFM.L and XDEM.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IWFM.L and XDEM.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

Both ETFs track MSCI World Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and DWS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWFM.L and XDEM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer