PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWFM.L vs. DPYG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWFM.L vs. DPYG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IWFM.L) and iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (DPYG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IWFM.L is traded in GBp, while DPYG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the DPYG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWFM.L achieves a 15.16% return, which is significantly higher than DPYG.L's 12.89% return.


IWFM.L

1D
-1.38%
1M
-8.59%
6M
10.44%
YTD
15.16%
1Y
24.10%
3Y*
23.53%
5Y*
12.94%
10Y*
14.26%

DPYG.L

1D
0.55%
1M
3.56%
6M
9.15%
YTD
12.89%
1Y
16.82%
3Y*
9.59%
5Y*
1.77%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWFM.L vs. DPYG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IWFM.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc)
15.16%12.72%32.62%5.85%-8.21%15.58%24.16%23.25%1.00%
DPYG.L
iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
12.89%7.23%2.09%9.63%-23.02%27.74%-13.69%19.26%3.27%

Correlation

The correlation between IWFM.L and DPYG.L is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2018

0.36

Over the past year, the correlation between IWFM.L and DPYG.L has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWFM.L vs. DPYG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWFM.L
IWFM.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
IWFM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWFM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWFM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
IWFM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWFM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

DPYG.L
DPYG.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
DPYG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DPYG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
DPYG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
DPYG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
DPYG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWFM.L vs. DPYG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IWFM.L) and iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (DPYG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IWFM.LDPYG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.25

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

1.82

+0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.29

6.29

+2.00

IWFM.L vs. DPYG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWFM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the DPYG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWFM.L and DPYG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IWFM.L vs. DPYG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWFM.L drawdown since its inception was -41.86%, roughly equal to the maximum DPYG.L drawdown of -42.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWFM.L and DPYG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWFM.LDPYG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.86%

-42.46%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.11%

-9.23%

-1.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.15%

-16.90%

-4.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.15%

-31.71%

+10.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.11%

0.00%

-11.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.37%

-11.56%

+2.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

2.67%

+0.23%

Volatility

IWFM.L vs. DPYG.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IWFM.L) has a higher volatility of 8.80% compared to iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (DPYG.L) at 3.50%. This indicates that IWFM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DPYG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWFM.LDPYG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.80%

3.50%

+5.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.80%

9.11%

+7.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.21%

11.47%

+7.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.01%

15.26%

+6.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.70%

17.39%

+2.31%

IWFM.L vs. DPYG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWFM.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DPYG.L's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

IWFM.L vs. DPYG.L - Dividend Comparison

IWFM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DPYG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DPYG.L
iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
2.79%3.02%3.10%3.00%3.71%2.13%2.98%2.95%2.98%
IWFM.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWFM.L and DPYG.L have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IWFM.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IWFM.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for DPYG.L.

IWFM.L is categorized as Momentum, while DPYG.L is REIT. IWFM.L tracks MSCI World Momentum Index, while DPYG.L tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Dividend+ (GBP Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IWFM.L and 0.64% for DPYG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWFM.L and DPYG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer