IWDP.L vs. GLRE.L
IWDP.L (iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP) and GLRE.L (SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF) are both REIT funds tracking the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, from iShares and State Street respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWDP.L returned 3.99%/yr vs 3.90%/yr for GLRE.L. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IWDP.L charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GLRE.L.
Performance
IWDP.L vs. GLRE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IWDP.L is traded in GBp, while GLRE.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GLRE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IWDP.L having a 6.86% return and GLRE.L slightly higher at 7.04%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IWDP.L having a 3.99% annualized return and GLRE.L not far behind at 3.90%.
IWDP.L
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- YTD
- 6.86%
- 6M
- 7.06%
- 1Y
- 11.51%
- 3Y*
- 5.75%
- 5Y*
- 1.76%
- 10Y*
- 3.99%
GLRE.L
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- YTD
- 7.04%
- 6M
- 5.99%
- 1Y
- 13.15%
- 3Y*
- 6.06%
- 5Y*
- 2.44%
- 10Y*
- 3.90%
IWDP.L vs. GLRE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWDP.L iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP | 6.86% | 1.71% | 1.22% | 4.00% | -14.93% | 26.93% | -12.50% | 17.31% | -0.09% | 1.37% |
GLRE.L SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF | 7.04% | 2.13% | 1.21% | 5.68% | -16.37% | 31.85% | -13.50% | 15.95% | -0.79% | 0.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWDP.L and GLRE.L is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2012 | 0.89 |
The correlation between IWDP.L and GLRE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
IWDP.L vs. GLRE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWDP.L
GLRE.L
Real Estate
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
IWDP.L
GLRE.L
Financial Services
IWDP.L
GLRE.L
Consumer Cyclical
IWDP.L
GLRE.L
-
Basic Materials
IWDP.L
-
GLRE.L
-
Communication Services
IWDP.L
-
GLRE.L
-
Consumer Defensive
IWDP.L
-
GLRE.L
-
Energy
IWDP.L
-
GLRE.L
-
Healthcare
IWDP.L
-
GLRE.L
-
Industrials
IWDP.L
-
GLRE.L
Technology
IWDP.L
-
GLRE.L
-
Utilities
IWDP.L
-
GLRE.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWDP.L vs. GLRE.L — Risk / Return Rank
IWDP.L
GLRE.L
IWDP.L vs. GLRE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP (IWDP.L) and SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (GLRE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWDP.L | GLRE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.19 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | 1.68 | -0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.13 | 5.37 | -1.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWDP.L | GLRE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.05 | 1.06 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | 0.16 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | 0.23 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.35 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
IWDP.L vs. GLRE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWDP.L drawdown since its inception was -58.29%, which is greater than GLRE.L's maximum drawdown of -36.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWDP.L and GLRE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWDP.L | GLRE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.29% | -36.91% | -21.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.61% | -7.79% | -0.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.50% | -17.16% | +0.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.31% | -27.71% | +1.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.66% | -36.91% | +1.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.40% | -4.45% | +1.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.23% | -10.05% | -1.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.78% | 2.44% | +0.34% |
Volatility
IWDP.L vs. GLRE.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP (IWDP.L) is 3.00%, while SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (GLRE.L) has a volatility of 3.51%. This indicates that IWDP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLRE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWDP.L | GLRE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.00% | 3.51% | -0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.45% | 9.62% | -1.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.89% | 12.38% | -1.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.76% | 15.68% | -1.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.54% | 16.96% | -1.42% |
IWDP.L vs. GLRE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWDP.L has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than GLRE.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWDP.L vs. GLRE.L - Dividend Comparison
IWDP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%, more than GLRE.L's 2.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLRE.L SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF | 2.58% | 2.72% | 2.79% | 2.62% | 2.85% | 1.82% | 2.51% | 3.16% | 3.54% | 3.86% | 2.66% | 2.15% |
IWDP.L iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP | 3.03% | 3.13% | 3.17% | 3.14% | 3.56% | 2.17% | 3.11% | 3.03% | 3.82% | 3.05% | 2.96% | 2.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWDP.L and GLRE.L have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GLRE.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLRE.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IWDP.L.
Both ETFs track FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for IWDP.L and 0.40% for GLRE.L.
Find the right allocation for IWDP.L and GLRE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer