IWDG.L vs. WRDA.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF (IWDG.L) and UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L).
IWDG.L and WRDA.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IWDG.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World Index. It was launched on Jul 28, 2023. WRDA.L is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the MSCI World Index. It was launched on Aug 5, 2025. Both IWDG.L and WRDA.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IWDG.L vs. WRDA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IWDG.L vs. WRDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IWDG.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF | -4.50% | 18.71% | 19.44% |
WRDA.L UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc | -3.09% | 12.77% | 20.02% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWDG.L achieves a -4.50% return, which is significantly lower than WRDA.L's -3.09% return.
IWDG.L
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -6.55%
- YTD
- -4.50%
- 6M
- -0.28%
- 1Y
- 17.79%
- 3Y*
- 16.55%
- 5Y*
- 10.14%
- 10Y*
- —
WRDA.L
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -5.33%
- YTD
- -3.09%
- 6M
- 0.93%
- 1Y
- 16.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IWDG.L vs. WRDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWDG.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than WRDA.L's 0.06% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IWDG.L vs. WRDA.L — Risk / Return Rank
IWDG.L
WRDA.L
IWDG.L vs. WRDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF (IWDG.L) and UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWDG.L | WRDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.15 | 1.20 | -0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.63 | 1.67 | -0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.25 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 1.48 | -0.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.81 | 6.36 | +0.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWDG.L | WRDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 1.20 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 1.07 | -0.41 |
Correlation
The correlation between IWDG.L and WRDA.L is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IWDG.L vs. WRDA.L - Dividend Comparison
IWDG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, while WRDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWDG.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF | 1.15% | 1.11% | 1.24% | 1.42% | 1.74% | 1.19% | 1.35% | 1.83% | 2.14% | 0.61% |
WRDA.L UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IWDG.L vs. WRDA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWDG.L drawdown since its inception was -34.20%, which is greater than WRDA.L's maximum drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWDG.L and WRDA.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWDG.L | WRDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.20% | -18.38% | -15.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.81% | -10.08% | -1.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.99% | -5.33% | -1.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.70% | -2.40% | -2.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.38% | 2.34% | +0.04% |
Volatility
IWDG.L vs. WRDA.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF (IWDG.L) has a higher volatility of 4.57% compared to UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L) at 3.91%. This indicates that IWDG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WRDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IWDG.L | WRDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.57% | 3.91% | +0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.34% | 7.93% | +0.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.39% | 13.66% | +1.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.76% | 12.50% | +2.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.98% | 12.50% | +3.48% |