PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWDE.L vs. SMH.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWDE.L vs. SMH.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Acc) (IWDE.L) and VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMH.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IWDE.L is traded in EUR, while SMH.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SMH.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWDE.L achieves a 9.63% return, which is significantly lower than SMH.L's 78.18% return.


IWDE.L

1D
0.02%
1M
0.51%
6M
7.50%
YTD
9.63%
1Y
21.01%
3Y*
17.17%
5Y*
10.22%
10Y*
11.07%

SMH.L

1D
-1.49%
1M
-6.69%
6M
55.89%
YTD
78.18%
1Y
131.40%
3Y*
52.92%
5Y*
36.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWDE.L vs. SMH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IWDE.L
iShares MSCI World EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Acc)
9.63%16.39%19.76%21.13%-18.36%23.42%3.29%
SMH.L
VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF
78.18%31.49%32.30%70.67%-31.54%53.43%3.10%

Correlation

The correlation between IWDE.L and SMH.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2020

0.73

The correlation between IWDE.L and SMH.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

IWDE.L vs. SMH.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IWDE.L
SMH.L

Technology

30.5%
100.0%

Financial Services

15.7%

-

Industrials

10.9%

-

Healthcare

9.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.8%

-

Communication Services

8.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.6%

-

Basic Materials

3.2%

-

Utilities

2.8%

-

Real Estate

1.7%

-

Technology

IWDE.L
30.5%
SMH.L
100.0%

Financial Services

IWDE.L
15.7%
SMH.L

-

Industrials

IWDE.L
10.9%
SMH.L

-

Healthcare

IWDE.L
9.1%
SMH.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

IWDE.L
8.8%
SMH.L

-

Communication Services

IWDE.L
8.0%
SMH.L

-

Consumer Defensive

IWDE.L
4.9%
SMH.L

-

Energy

IWDE.L
3.6%
SMH.L

-

Basic Materials

IWDE.L
3.2%
SMH.L

-

Utilities

IWDE.L
2.8%
SMH.L

-

Real Estate

IWDE.L
1.7%
SMH.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWDE.L vs. SMH.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWDE.L
IWDE.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
IWDE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWDE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWDE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IWDE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWDE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

SMH.L
SMH.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SMH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWDE.L vs. SMH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Acc) (IWDE.L) and VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IWDE.LSMH.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.49

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

9.66

-6.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.18

30.73

-19.56

IWDE.L vs. SMH.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWDE.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is lower than the SMH.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWDE.L and SMH.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IWDE.L vs. SMH.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWDE.L drawdown since its inception was -33.32%, smaller than the maximum SMH.L drawdown of -37.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWDE.L and SMH.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWDE.LSMH.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.32%

-37.62%

+4.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.82%

-13.53%

+5.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.50%

-37.05%

+19.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.72%

-37.62%

+13.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-13.53%

+13.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.50%

-10.06%

+5.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

4.25%

-2.37%

Volatility

IWDE.L vs. SMH.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI World EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Acc) (IWDE.L) is 2.67%, while VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMH.L) has a volatility of 16.04%. This indicates that IWDE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWDE.LSMH.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.67%

16.04%

-13.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.18%

29.91%

-20.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.69%

36.85%

-25.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.91%

32.81%

-17.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.26%

32.13%

-16.87%

IWDE.L vs. SMH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWDE.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

IWDE.L vs. SMH.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IWDE.L nor SMH.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IWDE.L and SMH.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SMH.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SMH.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for IWDE.L.

IWDE.L is categorized as Global Equities, while SMH.L is Semiconductors. IWDE.L tracks MSCI World 100% Hedged to EUR Index, while SMH.L tracks MarketVector US Listed Semiconductor 10% Capped Screened Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for IWDE.L and 0.35% for SMH.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWDE.L and SMH.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer