IWDE.L vs. IGLN.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI World EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Acc) (IWDE.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L).
IWDE.L and IGLN.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IWDE.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World 100% Hedged to EUR Index. It was launched on Sep 30, 2010. IGLN.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold Price. It was launched on Apr 8, 2011. Both IWDE.L and IGLN.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IWDE.L vs. IGLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IWDE.L vs. IGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWDE.L iShares MSCI World EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Acc) | -2.56% | 16.39% | 19.76% | 21.13% | -18.36% | 23.42% | 11.49% | 23.65% | -10.06% | 16.85% |
IGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | 12.62% | 45.35% | 34.47% | 10.04% | 6.10% | 3.15% | 13.92% | 20.96% | 3.32% | -2.06% |
Different Trading Currencies
IWDE.L is traded in EUR, while IGLN.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IGLN.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWDE.L achieves a -2.56% return, which is significantly lower than IGLN.L's 8.76% return. Over the past 10 years, IWDE.L has underperformed IGLN.L with an annualized return of 10.30%, while IGLN.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.94% annualized return.
IWDE.L
- 1D
- 2.62%
- 1M
- -3.68%
- YTD
- -2.56%
- 6M
- 0.66%
- 1Y
- 16.80%
- 3Y*
- 15.56%
- 5Y*
- 9.10%
- 10Y*
- 10.30%
IGLN.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -11.97%
- YTD
- 8.76%
- 6M
- 21.15%
- 1Y
- 37.62%
- 3Y*
- 29.66%
- 5Y*
- 21.99%
- 10Y*
- 13.94%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IWDE.L vs. IGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWDE.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than IGLN.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IWDE.L vs. IGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
IWDE.L
IGLN.L
IWDE.L vs. IGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Acc) (IWDE.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWDE.L | IGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.11 | 1.52 | -0.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.58 | 1.98 | -0.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.30 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.96 | 2.26 | -0.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.33 | 8.33 | 0.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWDE.L | IGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.11 | 1.52 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 1.34 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.93 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.58 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between IWDE.L and IGLN.L is -0.03. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
IWDE.L vs. IGLN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IWDE.L nor IGLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
IWDE.L vs. IGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWDE.L drawdown since its inception was -33.32%, smaller than the maximum IGLN.L drawdown of -36.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWDE.L and IGLN.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWDE.L | IGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.32% | -45.24% | +11.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.61% | -17.36% | +5.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.72% | -21.15% | -2.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.32% | -21.15% | -12.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.75% | -9.80% | +5.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.54% | -19.88% | +15.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 4.58% | -2.60% |
Volatility
IWDE.L vs. IGLN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI World EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Acc) (IWDE.L) is 5.19%, while iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L) has a volatility of 11.63%. This indicates that IWDE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IWDE.L | IGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.19% | 11.63% | -6.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.70% | 21.68% | -12.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.09% | 24.66% | -9.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.83% | 16.40% | -1.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.33% | 14.96% | +0.37% |