PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWDA.L vs. BRYN.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWDA.L vs. BRYN.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc (BRYN.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IWDA.L is traded in USD, while BRYN.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the BRYN.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWDA.L achieves a 8.48% return, which is significantly higher than BRYN.DE's -2.40% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IWDA.L having a 13.34% annualized return and BRYN.DE not far behind at 13.26%.


IWDA.L

1D
2.15%
1M
1.12%
YTD
8.48%
6M
9.90%
1Y
23.88%
3Y*
19.55%
5Y*
11.47%
10Y*
13.34%

BRYN.DE

1D
0.75%
1M
0.67%
YTD
-2.40%
6M
-1.95%
1Y
-0.38%
3Y*
13.29%
5Y*
11.20%
10Y*
13.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWDA.L vs. BRYN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
8.48%21.03%19.11%24.27%-18.11%22.19%16.06%27.13%-9.01%22.75%
BRYN.DE
Berkshire Hathaway Inc
-2.40%10.28%27.03%15.68%2.58%30.76%1.39%12.99%0.16%23.78%

Correlation

The correlation between IWDA.L and BRYN.DE is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2009

0.46

Over the past year, the correlation between IWDA.L and BRYN.DE has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWDA.L vs. BRYN.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWDA.L
IWDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
IWDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
IWDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

BRYN.DE
BRYN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
BRYN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRYN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRYN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
BRYN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRYN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWDA.L vs. BRYN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc (BRYN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IWDA.LBRYN.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.01

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

0.01

+2.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.55

0.02

+11.53

IWDA.L vs. BRYN.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWDA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is higher than the BRYN.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWDA.L and BRYN.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IWDA.L vs. BRYN.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWDA.L drawdown since its inception was -34.11%, smaller than the maximum BRYN.DE drawdown of -97.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWDA.L and BRYN.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWDA.LBRYN.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.11%

-97.94%

+63.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.31%

-9.74%

+1.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.94%

-14.17%

-2.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.88%

-26.57%

+0.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.11%

-29.89%

-4.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.65%

-84.49%

+82.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.41%

-84.29%

+79.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

4.68%

-2.66%

Volatility

IWDA.L vs. BRYN.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L) is 3.96%, while Berkshire Hathaway Inc (BRYN.DE) has a volatility of 4.21%. This indicates that IWDA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRYN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWDA.LBRYN.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.96%

4.21%

-0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.61%

10.79%

-1.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.26%

15.05%

-2.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.72%

17.62%

-1.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.92%

18.79%

-2.87%

Dividends

IWDA.L vs. BRYN.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither IWDA.L nor BRYN.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IWDA.L and BRYN.DE have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWDA.L and BRYN.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer