IWDA.AS vs. DFND.AS
IWDA.AS (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and DFND.AS (iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWDA.AS is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while DFND.AS is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P Developed BMI Select Aerospace & Defense 35/20 Capped Index NR. Both are passively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IWDA.AS charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for DFND.AS.
Performance
IWDA.AS vs. DFND.AS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IWDA.AS is traded in EUR, while DFND.AS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DFND.AS values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
IWDA.AS
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 5.58%
- YTD
- 11.10%
- 6M
- 11.60%
- 1Y
- 23.84%
- 3Y*
- 17.67%
- 5Y*
- 12.89%
- 10Y*
- 12.88%
DFND.AS
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWDA.AS vs. DFND.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IWDA.AS iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 11.10% | 7.08% | 18.72% |
DFND.AS iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 19.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWDA.AS and DFND.AS is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2024 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWDA.AS vs. DFND.AS — Risk / Return Rank
IWDA.AS
DFND.AS
IWDA.AS vs. DFND.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.AS) and iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF (DFND.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWDA.AS | DFND.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.65 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.56 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWDA.AS | DFND.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | — | — |
Drawdowns
IWDA.AS vs. DFND.AS - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWDA.AS | DFND.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.45% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.31% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.25% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.63% | — | — |
Volatility
IWDA.AS vs. DFND.AS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWDA.AS | DFND.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.79% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.61% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.96% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.08% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.00% | — | — |
IWDA.AS vs. DFND.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWDA.AS has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DFND.AS's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWDA.AS vs. DFND.AS - Dividend Comparison
Neither IWDA.AS nor DFND.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IWDA.AS and DFND.AS have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IWDA.AS is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IWDA.AS is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for DFND.AS.
IWDA.AS is categorized as Global Equities, while DFND.AS is Industrials Equities. IWDA.AS tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while DFND.AS tracks S&P Developed BMI Select Aerospace & Defense 35/20 Capped Index NR. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IWDA.AS and 0.35% for DFND.AS.
Find the right allocation for IWDA.AS and DFND.AS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer