IVVW vs. SMST
IVVW (iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF) and SMST (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVVW is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Enhanced 1% OTM BuyWrite Index, while SMST is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Defiance. IVVW is passively managed, while SMST is actively managed. Over the past year, IVVW returned 18.35% vs 223.39% for SMST. At a correlation of -0.44, they often move in opposite directions. IVVW charges 0.25%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for SMST.
Performance
IVVW vs. SMST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVVW achieves a 6.90% return, which is significantly higher than SMST's -36.68% return.
IVVW
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 2.36%
- 6M
- 6.32%
- YTD
- 6.90%
- 1Y
- 18.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMST
- 1D
- -12.10%
- 1M
- 26.91%
- 6M
- -13.52%
- YTD
- -36.68%
- 1Y
- 223.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IVVW vs. SMST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IVVW iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF | 6.90% | 11.71% | 5.71% |
SMST Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF | -36.68% | -44.36% | -91.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVVW and SMST is -0.45, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2024 | -0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVVW vs. SMST — Risk / Return Rank
IVVW
SMST
IVVW vs. SMST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IVVW | SMST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.30 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.17 | 2.63 | +0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.82 | 5.07 | +11.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IVVW vs. SMST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVVW drawdown since its inception was -16.79%, smaller than the maximum SMST drawdown of -99.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVVW and SMST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVVW | SMST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.79% | -99.25% | +82.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.81% | -85.39% | +79.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -97.51% | +97.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.70% | -90.91% | +89.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.09% | 44.25% | -43.16% |
Volatility
IVVW vs. SMST - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW) is 2.66%, while Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST) has a volatility of 57.45%. This indicates that IVVW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVVW | SMST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.66% | 57.45% | -54.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.08% | 136.03% | -128.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.17% | 149.51% | -141.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.59% | 167.79% | -155.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.59% | 167.79% | -155.20% |
IVVW vs. SMST - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVVW has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SMST's 1.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVVW vs. SMST - Dividend Comparison
IVVW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.04%, while SMST has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
IVVW iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF | 19.04% | 18.55% | 13.72% |
SMST Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVVW and SMST have a correlation of -0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMST has higher volatility (57.45%) compared to IVVW (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVVW dropped -16.79% vs SMST's -99.25%.
On 1-year performance, SMST leads with 223.39% vs 18.35% for IVVW. On fees, IVVW is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IVVW has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SMST has performed better with a 223.39% return vs 18.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVVW is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for SMST.
IVVW has the higher dividend yield at 19.04%, compared with 0.00% for SMST.
IVVW is categorized as Derivative Income, while SMST is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IVVW and 1.29% for SMST.
IVVW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVVW and SMST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer