PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVVM vs. PHEQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVVM vs. PHEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF (IVVM) and Parametric Hedged Equity ETF (PHEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVVM achieves a 6.70% return, which is significantly higher than PHEQ's 6.17% return.


IVVM

1D
0.57%
1M
0.51%
6M
5.79%
YTD
6.70%
1Y
14.40%
3Y*
13.47%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.75%

PHEQ

1D
0.35%
1M
0.11%
6M
6.28%
YTD
6.17%
1Y
12.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$740.71K$781.13K$703.06K
$437.09K$507.48K$589.65K

IVVM vs. PHEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IVVM
iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF
6.70%14.24%16.08%5.42%
PHEQ
Parametric Hedged Equity ETF
6.17%11.76%14.94%6.39%

Correlation

The correlation between IVVM and PHEQ is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2023

0.79

The correlation between IVVM and PHEQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVVM vs. PHEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IVVM
IVVM Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
IVVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVVM Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
IVVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

PHEQ
PHEQ Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
PHEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
PHEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IVVM vs. PHEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF (IVVM) and Parametric Hedged Equity ETF (PHEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IVVMPHEQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.37

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

2.85

-0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.04

12.72

-0.68

IVVM vs. PHEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVVM Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the PHEQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVVM and PHEQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IVVM vs. PHEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVVM drawdown since its inception was -11.62%, smaller than the maximum PHEQ drawdown of -12.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVVM and PHEQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVVMPHEQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.62%

-12.55%

+0.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.31%

-4.26%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-0.46%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.90%

-0.95%

+0.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.10%

0.95%

+0.15%

Volatility

IVVM vs. PHEQ - Volatility Comparison

iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF (IVVM) has a higher volatility of 2.14% compared to Parametric Hedged Equity ETF (PHEQ) at 1.60%. This indicates that IVVM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PHEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVVMPHEQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.14%

1.60%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.77%

4.85%

+0.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.42%

6.21%

+1.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.50%

8.49%

+1.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.50%

8.49%

+1.01%

IVVM vs. PHEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVVM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PHEQ's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

IVVM vs. PHEQ - Dividend Comparison

IVVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than PHEQ's 0.94% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IVVM
iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF
0.64%0.68%0.62%0.00%
PHEQ
Parametric Hedged Equity ETF
0.94%1.19%1.39%1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVVM and PHEQ have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVVM has higher volatility (2.14%) compared to PHEQ (1.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVVM dropped -11.62% vs PHEQ's -12.55%.

On 1-year performance, IVVM leads with 14.40% vs 12.91% for PHEQ. On fees, PHEQ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PHEQ has been the lower-risk option at 1.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IVVM has performed better with a 14.40% return vs 12.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PHEQ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IVVM.

PHEQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.64% for IVVM.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Parametric. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IVVM and 0.29% for PHEQ.

PHEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVVM and PHEQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer