IVVM vs. FXAIX
IVVM (iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF) and FXAIX (Fidelity 500 Index Fund) are both funds - IVVM is a Options Trading fund actively managed by iShares, while FXAIX is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. IVVM is actively managed, while FXAIX is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IVVM returned 13.47%/yr vs 19.03%/yr for FXAIX. Their correlation of 0.94 means they have usually moved in the same direction. IVVM charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for FXAIX.
Performance
IVVM vs. FXAIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVVM achieves a 6.70% return, which is significantly lower than FXAIX's 9.35% return.
IVVM
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- 6M
- 5.79%
- YTD
- 6.70%
- 1Y
- 14.40%
- 3Y*
- 13.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.75%
FXAIX
- 1D
- 1.66%
- 1M
- -0.56%
- 6M
- 7.79%
- YTD
- 9.35%
- 1Y
- 20.63%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 12.68%
- 10Y*
- 15.00%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.89%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $740.71K | $781.13K | $703.06K |
IVVM vs. FXAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IVVM iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF | 6.70% | 14.24% | 16.08% | 5.17% |
FXAIX Fidelity 500 Index Fund | 9.35% | 17.84% | 25.01% | 9.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVVM and FXAIX is 0.95, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023 | 0.94 |
The correlation between IVVM and FXAIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVVM vs. FXAIX — Risk / Return Rank
IVVM
FXAIX
IVVM vs. FXAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF (IVVM) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IVVM | FXAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.26 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 2.06 | +0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.04 | 8.86 | +3.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IVVM vs. FXAIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVVM drawdown since its inception was -11.62%, smaller than the maximum FXAIX drawdown of -33.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVVM and FXAIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVVM | FXAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.62% | -33.79% | +22.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.31% | -8.89% | +3.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.62% | -18.76% | +7.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.40% | -2.11% | +1.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.90% | -3.77% | +2.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.10% | 2.07% | -0.97% |
Volatility
IVVM vs. FXAIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF (IVVM) is 2.14%, while Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX) has a volatility of 3.44%. This indicates that IVVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVVM | FXAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.14% | 3.44% | -1.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.77% | 10.09% | -4.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.42% | 12.86% | -5.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.50% | 17.03% | -7.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.50% | 18.07% | -8.57% |
IVVM vs. FXAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVVM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FXAIX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVVM vs. FXAIX - Dividend Comparison
IVVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than FXAIX's 1.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXAIX Fidelity 500 Index Fund | 1.07% | 1.11% | 1.25% | 1.45% | 1.69% | 1.22% | 1.60% | 2.06% | 2.72% | 1.97% | 2.52% | 2.83% |
IVVM iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF | 0.64% | 0.68% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, IVVM and FXAIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FXAIX has higher volatility (3.44%) compared to IVVM (2.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVVM dropped -11.62% vs FXAIX's -33.79%.
IVVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVVM and FXAIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer