PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVVM vs. AAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVVM vs. AAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF (IVVM) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 (AAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVVM achieves a 5.95% return, which is significantly higher than AAPR's 3.82% return.


IVVM

1D
-0.22%
1M
1.95%
YTD
5.95%
6M
6.15%
1Y
16.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AAPR

1D
-0.14%
1M
0.68%
YTD
3.82%
6M
4.48%
1Y
9.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVVM vs. AAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IVVM and AAPR is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024

0.82

The correlation between IVVM and AAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVVM vs. AAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVVM
IVVM Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
IVVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVVM Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
IVVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVVM Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPR
AAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
AAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVVM vs. AAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF (IVVM) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 (AAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IVVMAAPRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.99

-0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

12.12

-9.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.34

62.99

-47.64

IVVM vs. AAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVVM Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is lower than the AAPR Sharpe Ratio of 4.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVVM and AAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IVVMAAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

4.18

-1.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.49

1.73

-0.24

Drawdowns

IVVM vs. AAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVVM drawdown since its inception was -11.62%, which is greater than AAPR's maximum drawdown of -5.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVVM and AAPR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVVMAAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.62%

-5.99%

-5.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.31%

-0.81%

-4.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-0.15%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.92%

-0.45%

-0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

0.16%

+0.90%

Volatility

IVVM vs. AAPR - Volatility Comparison

iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF (IVVM) has a higher volatility of 0.76% compared to Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 (AAPR) at 0.68%. This indicates that IVVM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVVMAAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.76%

0.68%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.62%

1.57%

+4.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.04%

2.36%

+4.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.62%

4.81%

+4.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.62%

4.81%

+4.81%

IVVM vs. AAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVVM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than AAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

IVVM vs. AAPR - Dividend Comparison

IVVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, while AAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


IVVM and AAPR have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVVM has higher volatility (0.76%) compared to AAPR (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVVM dropped -11.62% vs AAPR's -5.99%.

On 1-year performance, IVVM leads with 16.27% vs 9.83% for AAPR. On fees, IVVM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IVVM has performed better with a 16.27% return vs 9.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVVM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for AAPR.

IVVM has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.00% for AAPR.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IVVM and 0.79% for AAPR.

AAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.18 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVVM and AAPR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer