IVVB vs. IBIT
IVVB (iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVVB is a Options Trading fund actively managed by iShares, while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. IVVB is actively managed, while IBIT is passively managed. Over the past year, IVVB returned 14.57% vs -38.74% for IBIT. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IVVB charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.
Performance
IVVB vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVVB achieves a 4.57% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -25.48% return.
IVVB
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 1.91%
- YTD
- 4.57%
- 6M
- 4.37%
- 1Y
- 14.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBIT
- 1D
- -2.76%
- 1M
- -18.50%
- YTD
- -25.48%
- 6M
- -29.84%
- 1Y
- -38.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IVVB vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IVVB iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF | 4.57% | 9.60% | 18.36% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -25.48% | -6.41% | 99.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVVB and IBIT is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVVB vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank
IVVB
IBIT
IVVB vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF (IVVB) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IVVB | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.02 | -0.89 | +2.91 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.82 | -1.23 | +4.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 0.86 | +0.52 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.55 | -0.79 | +3.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.94 | -1.36 | +12.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IVVB | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | -0.89 | +2.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.31 | 0.30 | +1.01 |
Drawdowns
IVVB vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVVB drawdown since its inception was -13.08%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVVB and IBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVVB | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.08% | -49.36% | +36.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.75% | -49.36% | +43.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | -48.10% | +47.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.61% | -16.02% | +14.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.34% | 28.44% | -27.10% |
Volatility
IVVB vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF (IVVB) is 0.74%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 9.50%. This indicates that IVVB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVVB | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.74% | 9.50% | -8.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.49% | 34.44% | -28.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.27% | 43.73% | -36.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.28% | 50.19% | -40.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.28% | 50.19% | -40.91% |
IVVB vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVVB has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVVB vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison
IVVB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IVVB iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF | 1.17% | 1.22% | 0.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVVB and IBIT have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBIT has higher volatility (9.50%) compared to IVVB (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVVB dropped -13.08% vs IBIT's -49.36%.
On 1-year performance, IVVB leads with 14.57% vs -38.74% for IBIT. On fees, IBIT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IVVB has been the lower-risk option at 0.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IVVB has performed better with a 14.57% return vs -38.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IVVB.
IVVB has the higher dividend yield at 1.17%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.
IVVB is categorized as Options Trading, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IVVB and 0.25% for IBIT.
IVVB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVVB and IBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer