IVVB vs. GOCT
IVVB (iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF) and GOCT (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - October) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, IVVB returned 12.68% vs 14.86% for GOCT. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IVVB charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for GOCT.
Performance
IVVB vs. GOCT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVVB achieves a 3.81% return, which is significantly lower than GOCT's 5.00% return.
IVVB
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -0.43%
- YTD
- 3.81%
- 6M
- 2.94%
- 1Y
- 12.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GOCT
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- YTD
- 5.00%
- 6M
- 4.60%
- 1Y
- 14.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IVVB vs. GOCT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IVVB iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF | 3.81% | 9.60% | 18.66% | 7.13% |
GOCT FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - October | 5.00% | 12.29% | 8.16% | 6.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVVB and GOCT is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2023 | 0.85 |
The correlation between IVVB and GOCT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVVB vs. GOCT — Risk / Return Rank
IVVB
GOCT
IVVB vs. GOCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF (IVVB) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - October (GOCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IVVB | GOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.49 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.22 | 3.39 | -1.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.43 | 16.78 | -7.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IVVB vs. GOCT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVVB drawdown since its inception was -13.08%, which is greater than GOCT's maximum drawdown of -10.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVVB and GOCT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVVB | GOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.08% | -10.47% | -2.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.75% | -4.40% | -1.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.88% | -0.62% | -0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.59% | -0.70% | -0.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.35% | 0.89% | +0.46% |
Volatility
IVVB vs. GOCT - Volatility Comparison
iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF (IVVB) has a higher volatility of 1.74% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - October (GOCT) at 1.60%. This indicates that IVVB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVVB | GOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.74% | 1.60% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.49% | 4.85% | +0.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.40% | 6.09% | +1.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.25% | 7.44% | +1.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.25% | 7.44% | +1.81% |
IVVB vs. GOCT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVVB has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than GOCT's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVVB vs. GOCT - Dividend Comparison
IVVB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, while GOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GOCT FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IVVB iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF | 1.18% | 1.22% | 0.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, IVVB and GOCT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IVVB has higher volatility (1.74%) compared to GOCT (1.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVVB dropped -13.08% vs GOCT's -10.47%.
On 1-year performance, GOCT leads with 14.86% vs 12.68% for IVVB. On fees, IVVB is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, GOCT has been the lower-risk option at 1.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GOCT has performed better with a 14.86% return vs 12.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVVB is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GOCT.
IVVB has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 0.00% for GOCT.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IVVB and 0.85% for GOCT.
GOCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVVB and GOCT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer