PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVVB vs. GOCT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVVB vs. GOCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF (IVVB) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - October (GOCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVVB achieves a 3.81% return, which is significantly lower than GOCT's 5.00% return.


IVVB

1D
-0.46%
1M
-0.43%
YTD
3.81%
6M
2.94%
1Y
12.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GOCT

1D
-0.45%
1M
0.07%
YTD
5.00%
6M
4.60%
1Y
14.86%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVVB vs. GOCT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IVVB
iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF
3.81%9.60%18.66%7.13%
GOCT
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - October
5.00%12.29%8.16%6.96%

Correlation

The correlation between IVVB and GOCT is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2023

0.85

The correlation between IVVB and GOCT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVVB vs. GOCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVVB
IVVB Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
IVVB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVVB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVVB Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
IVVB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVVB Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

GOCT
GOCT Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
GOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
GOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVVB vs. GOCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF (IVVB) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - October (GOCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IVVBGOCTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.49

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

3.39

-1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.43

16.78

-7.35

IVVB vs. GOCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVVB Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is lower than the GOCT Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVVB and GOCT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IVVB vs. GOCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVVB drawdown since its inception was -13.08%, which is greater than GOCT's maximum drawdown of -10.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVVB and GOCT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVVBGOCTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.08%

-10.47%

-2.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.75%

-4.40%

-1.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.88%

-0.62%

-0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.59%

-0.70%

-0.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.35%

0.89%

+0.46%

Volatility

IVVB vs. GOCT - Volatility Comparison

iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF (IVVB) has a higher volatility of 1.74% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - October (GOCT) at 1.60%. This indicates that IVVB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVVBGOCTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.74%

1.60%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.49%

4.85%

+0.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.40%

6.09%

+1.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.25%

7.44%

+1.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.25%

7.44%

+1.81%

IVVB vs. GOCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVVB has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than GOCT's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

IVVB vs. GOCT - Dividend Comparison

IVVB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, while GOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, IVVB and GOCT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IVVB has higher volatility (1.74%) compared to GOCT (1.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVVB dropped -13.08% vs GOCT's -10.47%.

On 1-year performance, GOCT leads with 14.86% vs 12.68% for IVVB. On fees, IVVB is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, GOCT has been the lower-risk option at 1.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GOCT has performed better with a 14.86% return vs 12.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVVB is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GOCT.

IVVB has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 0.00% for GOCT.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IVVB and 0.85% for GOCT.

GOCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVVB and GOCT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer