IVVB vs. CAOS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IVVB (iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF) and CAOS (Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, IVVB returned 14.57% vs 1.88% for CAOS. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IVVB charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for CAOS.

Performance

IVVB vs. CAOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF (IVVB) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVVB achieves a 4.57% return, which is significantly higher than CAOS's 0.82% return.

IVVB

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: 1.91%
• YTD: 4.57%
• 6M: 4.37%
• 1Y: 14.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CAOS

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: -0.09%
• YTD: 0.82%
• 6M: 0.69%
• 1Y: 1.88%
• 3Y*: 4.26%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVVB vs. CAOS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
IVVB iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF	4.57%	9.60%	18.66%	2.60%
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF	0.82%	2.55%	5.33%	2.72%

Correlation

The correlation between IVVB and CAOS is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2023	0.01

The correlation between IVVB and CAOS shifts across timeframes, from -0.29 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IVVB vs. CAOS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IVVB	CAOS
Technology	35.6%	33.1%
Financial Services	11.8%	12.4%
Communication Services	11.2%	10.4%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	10.0%
Healthcare	8.5%	9.6%
Industrials	8.3%	8.5%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	5.4%
Energy	3.5%	4.1%
Utilities	2.4%	2.6%
Real Estate	1.9%	2.0%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.9%

Return for Risk

IVVB vs. CAOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVVB

IVVB Risk / Return Rank: 58
IVVB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
IVVB Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
IVVB Omega Ratio Rank: 63
IVVB Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
IVVB Martin Ratio Rank: 61

CAOS

CAOS Risk / Return Rank: 40
CAOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
CAOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
CAOS Omega Ratio Rank: 39
CAOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
CAOS Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVVB vs. CAOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF (IVVB) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IVVB	CAOS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	1.24	+0.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.82	1.98	+0.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.26	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.55	2.49	+0.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.94	6.22	+4.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IVVB vs. CAOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVVB Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the CAOS Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVVB and CAOS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IVVB	CAOS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.02	1.24	+0.78
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.31	1.21	+0.10

Drawdowns

IVVB vs. CAOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVVB drawdown since its inception was -13.08%, which is greater than CAOS's maximum drawdown of -3.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVVB and CAOS.

Drawdown Indicators

	IVVB	CAOS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.08%	-3.60%	-9.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.75%	-0.76%	-4.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-3.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.15%	-1.07%	+0.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.61%	-0.90%	-0.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.34%	0.30%	+1.04%

Volatility

IVVB vs. CAOS - Volatility Comparison

iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF (IVVB) has a higher volatility of 0.74% compared to Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) at 0.26%. This indicates that IVVB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IVVB	CAOS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.74%	0.26%	+0.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.49%	1.03%	+4.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.27%	1.52%	+5.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.28%	4.26%	+5.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.28%	4.26%	+5.02%

IVVB vs. CAOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVVB has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than CAOS's 0.63% expense ratio.

Dividends

IVVB vs. CAOS - Dividend Comparison

IVVB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, while CAOS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IVVB iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF	1.17%	1.22%	0.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IVVB and CAOS in my portfolio?

IVVB and CAOS have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IVVB or CAOS?

IVVB has higher volatility (0.74%) compared to CAOS (0.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVVB dropped -13.08% vs CAOS's -3.60%.

Which ETF is better, IVVB or CAOS?

On 1-year performance, IVVB leads with 14.57% vs 1.88% for CAOS. On fees, IVVB is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, CAOS has been the lower-risk option at 0.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IVVB or CAOS?

Over the 1-year period, IVVB has performed better with a 14.57% return vs 1.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IVVB or CAOS?

IVVB is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for CAOS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IVVB or CAOS?

IVVB has the higher dividend yield at 1.17%, compared with 0.00% for CAOS.

What is the main difference between IVVB and CAOS?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IVVB and 0.63% for CAOS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IVVB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.