IVV vs. SLV
IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) and SLV (iShares Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IVV returned 15.54%/yr vs 15.55%/yr for SLV. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IVV charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SLV.
Performance
IVV vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVV achieves a 10.85% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's 2.78% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IVV having a 15.54% annualized return and SLV not far ahead at 15.55%.
IVV
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 4.97%
- YTD
- 10.85%
- 6M
- 10.87%
- 1Y
- 28.00%
- 3Y*
- 22.43%
- 5Y*
- 13.88%
- 10Y*
- 15.54%
SLV
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 2.78%
- 6M
- 24.76%
- 1Y
- 110.59%
- 3Y*
- 45.06%
- 5Y*
- 20.76%
- 10Y*
- 15.55%
IVV vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 10.85% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -18.16% | 28.76% | 18.40% | 31.07% | -4.49% | 21.75% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 2.78% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -1.09% | 2.37% | -12.45% | 47.30% | 14.88% | -9.19% | 5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVV and SLV is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2006 | 0.21 |
IVV vs. SLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVV
SLV
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
IVV
SLV
-
Financial Services
IVV
SLV
-
Communication Services
IVV
SLV
-
Consumer Cyclical
IVV
SLV
-
Healthcare
IVV
SLV
-
Industrials
IVV
SLV
-
Consumer Defensive
IVV
SLV
-
Energy
IVV
SLV
-
Utilities
IVV
SLV
-
Real Estate
IVV
SLV
-
Basic Materials
IVV
SLV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVV vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
IVV
SLV
IVV vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IVV | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.35 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.17 | 2.62 | +0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.71 | 5.64 | +9.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IVV | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.39 | 1.89 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 0.58 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | 0.49 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.25 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
IVV vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVV drawdown since its inception was -55.25%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVV and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVV | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.25% | -76.28% | +21.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.89% | -42.45% | +33.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.75% | -42.45% | +23.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.53% | -42.45% | +17.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.90% | -42.81% | +8.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.76% | -37.30% | +36.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.78% | -44.67% | +33.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.91% | 19.67% | -17.76% |
Volatility
IVV vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is 2.87%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.30%. This indicates that IVV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVV | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.87% | 16.30% | -13.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.90% | 58.31% | -49.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.80% | 58.90% | -47.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.88% | 36.15% | -19.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.05% | 31.84% | -13.79% |
IVV vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVV has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVV vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
IVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.06% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVV and SLV have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLV has higher volatility (16.30%) compared to IVV (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVV dropped -55.25% vs SLV's -76.28%.
On 10-year performance, SLV leads with 15.55% vs 15.54% for IVV. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SLV has performed better with a 15.55% return vs 15.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.
IVV has the higher dividend yield at 1.06%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.
IVV is categorized as S&P 500, while SLV is Silver. IVV tracks S&P 500 Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for IVV and 0.50% for SLV.
IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVV and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer