IVV vs. IWS
IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) and IWS (iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while IWS is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell Midcap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IVV returned 15.47%/yr vs 10.51%/yr for IWS. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IVV charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for IWS.
Performance
IVV vs. IWS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVV achieves a 9.08% return, which is significantly lower than IWS's 16.45% return. Over the past 10 years, IVV has outperformed IWS with an annualized return of 15.47%, while IWS has yielded a comparatively lower 10.51% annualized return.
IVV
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 9.08%
- 6M
- 9.43%
- 1Y
- 25.77%
- 3Y*
- 20.95%
- 5Y*
- 13.42%
- 10Y*
- 15.47%
IWS
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 5.35%
- YTD
- 16.45%
- 6M
- 15.28%
- 1Y
- 29.26%
- 3Y*
- 16.65%
- 5Y*
- 8.67%
- 10Y*
- 10.51%
IVV vs. IWS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 9.08% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -18.16% | 28.76% | 18.40% | 31.07% | -4.49% | 21.75% |
IWS iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF | 16.45% | 10.82% | 12.91% | 12.52% | -12.29% | 28.10% | 4.83% | 26.73% | -12.43% | 13.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVV and IWS is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2001 | 0.89 |
The correlation between IVV and IWS shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IVV vs. IWS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVV
IWS
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
IVV
IWS
Financial Services
IVV
IWS
Communication Services
IVV
IWS
Consumer Cyclical
IVV
IWS
Healthcare
IVV
IWS
Industrials
IVV
IWS
Consumer Defensive
IVV
IWS
Energy
IVV
IWS
Utilities
IVV
IWS
Real Estate
IVV
IWS
Basic Materials
IVV
IWS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVV vs. IWS — Risk / Return Rank
IVV
IWS
IVV vs. IWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IVV | IWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.36 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | 3.68 | -0.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.43 | 13.82 | -1.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IVV vs. IWS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVV drawdown since its inception was -55.25%, smaller than the maximum IWS drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVV and IWS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVV | IWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.25% | -62.40% | +7.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.89% | -7.53% | -1.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.75% | -20.57% | +1.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.53% | -21.23% | -3.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.90% | -43.83% | +9.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.35% | 0.00% | -2.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.77% | -8.01% | -2.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 2.00% | -0.03% |
Volatility
IVV vs. IWS - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) have volatilities of 4.37% and 4.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVV | IWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.37% | 4.29% | +0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.59% | 9.97% | -0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.28% | 13.53% | -1.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 17.36% | -0.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.08% | 19.37% | -1.29% |
IVV vs. IWS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVV has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than IWS's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IVV vs. IWS - Dividend Comparison
IVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than IWS's 1.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.08% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
IWS iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF | 1.32% | 1.53% | 1.50% | 1.76% | 1.93% | 1.39% | 1.87% | 1.97% | 2.53% | 1.96% | 2.10% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVV and IWS have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IVV has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to IWS (4.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVV dropped -55.25% vs IWS's -62.40%.
On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.47% vs 10.51% for IWS. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.47% return vs 10.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for IWS.
IWS has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 1.08% for IVV.
IVV is categorized as S&P 500, while IWS is Mid Cap Value Equities. IVV tracks S&P 500 Index, while IWS tracks Russell Midcap Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for IVV and 0.23% for IWS.
IWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVV and IWS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer