IWS vs. QQQ
IWS (iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWS is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell Midcap Value Index, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWS returned 10.68%/yr vs 22.48%/yr for QQQ. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWS charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
IWS vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWS achieves a 17.05% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 20.41% return. Over the past 10 years, IWS has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 10.68%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 22.48% annualized return.
IWS
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 3.76%
- YTD
- 17.05%
- 6M
- 15.46%
- 1Y
- 29.21%
- 3Y*
- 17.66%
- 5Y*
- 9.34%
- 10Y*
- 10.68%
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 2.96%
- YTD
- 20.41%
- 6M
- 19.46%
- 1Y
- 40.91%
- 3Y*
- 27.47%
- 5Y*
- 16.94%
- 10Y*
- 22.48%
IWS vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWS iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF | 17.05% | 10.82% | 12.91% | 12.52% | -12.29% | 28.10% | 4.83% | 26.73% | -12.43% | 13.14% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 20.41% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWS and QQQ is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2001 | 0.73 |
The correlation between IWS and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IWS vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWS
QQQ
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Technology
IWS
QQQ
Industrials
IWS
QQQ
Financial Services
IWS
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
IWS
QQQ
Real Estate
IWS
QQQ
Healthcare
IWS
QQQ
Energy
IWS
QQQ
Utilities
IWS
QQQ
Basic Materials
IWS
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
IWS
QQQ
Communication Services
IWS
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWS vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
IWS
QQQ
IWS vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IWS | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.41 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.90 | 3.44 | +0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.62 | 12.79 | +1.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IWS vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWS drawdown since its inception was -62.40%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWS and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWS | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.40% | -82.97% | +20.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.53% | -11.96% | +4.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.57% | -22.77% | +2.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.23% | -35.12% | +13.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.83% | -35.12% | -8.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | -0.99% | +0.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.00% | -32.73% | +24.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.00% | 3.21% | -1.21% |
Volatility
IWS vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) is 4.18%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 8.47%. This indicates that IWS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWS | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.18% | 8.47% | -4.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.04% | 14.20% | -4.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.55% | 17.67% | -4.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.32% | 22.64% | -5.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.39% | 22.43% | -3.04% |
IWS vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWS has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IWS vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
IWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, more than QQQ's 0.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWS iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF | 1.33% | 1.53% | 1.50% | 1.76% | 1.93% | 1.39% | 1.87% | 1.97% | 2.53% | 1.96% | 2.10% | 2.14% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.41% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWS and QQQ have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQ has higher volatility (8.47%) compared to IWS (4.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWS dropped -62.40% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 22.48% vs 10.68% for IWS. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IWS has been the lower-risk option at 4.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 22.48% return vs 10.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for IWS.
IWS has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.49% for QQQ.
IWS is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. IWS tracks Russell Midcap Value Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for IWS and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWS and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer