PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVV vs. HIBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVV vs. HIBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVV achieves a 10.85% return, which is significantly lower than HIBL's 96.27% return.


IVV

1D
-0.76%
1M
4.97%
YTD
10.85%
6M
10.87%
1Y
28.00%
3Y*
22.43%
5Y*
13.88%
10Y*
15.54%

HIBL

1D
-2.25%
1M
38.56%
YTD
96.27%
6M
98.56%
1Y
279.13%
3Y*
62.03%
5Y*
11.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVV vs. HIBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
10.85%17.85%24.93%26.31%-18.16%28.76%18.40%4.80%
HIBL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares
96.27%60.38%-0.40%81.02%-68.24%129.14%-24.96%21.45%

Correlation

The correlation between IVV and HIBL is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2019

0.84

The correlation between IVV and HIBL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

IVV vs. HIBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVV
HIBL

Technology

35.6%
45.8%

Financial Services

11.8%
12.5%

Communication Services

11.2%
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
12.9%

Healthcare

8.5%
2.9%

Industrials

8.3%
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
0.6%

Energy

3.5%
2.2%

Utilities

2.4%
3.2%

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%
4.6%

Technology

IVV
35.6%
HIBL
45.8%

Financial Services

IVV
11.8%
HIBL
12.5%

Communication Services

IVV
11.2%
HIBL
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

IVV
10.1%
HIBL
12.9%

Healthcare

IVV
8.5%
HIBL
2.9%

Industrials

IVV
8.3%
HIBL
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

IVV
4.9%
HIBL
0.6%

Energy

IVV
3.5%
HIBL
2.2%

Utilities

IVV
2.4%
HIBL
3.2%

Real Estate

IVV
1.9%
HIBL

-

Basic Materials

IVV
1.8%
HIBL
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVV vs. HIBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

HIBL
HIBL Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
HIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
HIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVV vs. HIBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IVVHIBLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.47

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

8.96

-5.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.71

32.84

-18.13

IVV vs. HIBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVV Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is lower than the HIBL Sharpe Ratio of 4.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVV and HIBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IVVHIBLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

4.26

-1.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.14

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.24

+0.21

Drawdowns

IVV vs. HIBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVV drawdown since its inception was -55.25%, smaller than the maximum HIBL drawdown of -88.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVV and HIBL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVVHIBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.25%

-88.27%

+33.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-31.39%

+22.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.75%

-69.66%

+50.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.53%

-81.58%

+57.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

-2.25%

+1.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.78%

-44.20%

+33.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

8.55%

-6.64%

Volatility

IVV vs. HIBL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is 2.87%, while Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) has a volatility of 21.25%. This indicates that IVV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HIBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVVHIBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

21.25%

-18.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.90%

50.46%

-41.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.80%

66.16%

-54.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.88%

82.16%

-65.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.05%

91.89%

-73.84%

IVV vs. HIBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVV has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than HIBL's 1.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

IVV vs. HIBL - Dividend Comparison

IVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than HIBL's 1.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HIBL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares
1.18%2.43%0.82%0.69%0.00%0.06%0.19%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
1.06%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVV and HIBL have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HIBL has higher volatility (21.25%) compared to IVV (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVV dropped -55.25% vs HIBL's -88.27%.

On 5-year performance, IVV leads with 13.88% vs 11.57% for HIBL. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IVV has performed better with a 13.88% return vs 11.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.12% for HIBL.

HIBL has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 1.06% for IVV.

IVV is categorized as S&P 500, while HIBL is Leveraged Equities. IVV tracks S&P 500 Index, while HIBL tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for IVV and 1.12% for HIBL.

HIBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.26 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVV and HIBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer