PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVV vs. BBVLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVV vs. BBVLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and Bridge Builder Large Cap Value Fund (BBVLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IVV having a 9.08% return and BBVLX slightly lower at 8.97%. Over the past 10 years, IVV has outperformed BBVLX with an annualized return of 15.47%, while BBVLX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.17% annualized return.


IVV

1D
0.55%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
9.08%
6M
9.43%
1Y
24.38%
3Y*
20.95%
5Y*
13.42%
10Y*
15.47%

BBVLX

1D
1.60%
1M
2.31%
YTD
8.97%
6M
0.21%
1Y
9.84%
3Y*
15.23%
5Y*
9.56%
10Y*
12.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVV vs. BBVLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
9.08%17.85%24.93%26.31%-18.16%28.76%18.40%31.07%-4.49%21.75%
BBVLX
Bridge Builder Large Cap Value Fund
8.97%4.45%22.32%13.84%-5.32%26.23%9.57%28.49%-8.15%17.20%

Correlation

The correlation between IVV and BBVLX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2015

0.87

The correlation between IVV and BBVLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVV vs. BBVLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

BBVLX
BBVLX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
BBVLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBVLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBVLX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
BBVLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBVLX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVV vs. BBVLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and Bridge Builder Large Cap Value Fund (BBVLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IVVBBVLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.16

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

0.94

+1.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.43

2.53

+9.90

IVV vs. BBVLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVV Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is higher than the BBVLX Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVV and BBVLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IVV vs. BBVLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVV drawdown since its inception was -55.25%, which is greater than BBVLX's maximum drawdown of -38.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVV and BBVLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVVBBVLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.25%

-38.48%

-16.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-11.28%

+2.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.75%

-14.58%

-4.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.53%

-18.24%

-6.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.90%

-38.48%

+4.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.35%

-0.83%

-1.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.77%

-4.09%

-6.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

4.10%

-2.13%

Volatility

IVV vs. BBVLX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) has a higher volatility of 4.37% compared to Bridge Builder Large Cap Value Fund (BBVLX) at 3.67%. This indicates that IVV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBVLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVVBBVLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.37%

3.67%

+0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.59%

11.13%

-1.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.28%

13.36%

-1.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.95%

16.33%

+0.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.08%

17.95%

+0.13%

IVV vs. BBVLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVV has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than BBVLX's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IVV vs. BBVLX - Dividend Comparison

IVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than BBVLX's 1.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBVLX
Bridge Builder Large Cap Value Fund
1.68%1.89%14.73%5.11%9.12%7.09%1.62%1.80%3.45%2.23%1.68%1.24%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
1.08%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVV and BBVLX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVV has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to BBVLX (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVV dropped -55.25% vs BBVLX's -38.48%.

IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVV and BBVLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer