IVV vs. BBCPX
IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) and BBCPX (Bridge Builder Core Plus Bond Fund) are both funds - IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while BBCPX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by Bridge Builder. Over the past 10 years, IVV returned 15.47%/yr vs 2.32%/yr for BBCPX. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IVV charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for BBCPX.
Performance
IVV vs. BBCPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVV achieves a 9.08% return, which is significantly higher than BBCPX's 0.03% return. Over the past 10 years, IVV has outperformed BBCPX with an annualized return of 15.47%, while BBCPX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.32% annualized return.
IVV
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 9.08%
- 6M
- 9.43%
- 1Y
- 25.77%
- 3Y*
- 20.95%
- 5Y*
- 13.42%
- 10Y*
- 15.47%
BBCPX
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 1.41%
- YTD
- 0.03%
- 6M
- 0.89%
- 1Y
- 5.64%
- 3Y*
- 4.96%
- 5Y*
- 0.69%
- 10Y*
- 2.32%
IVV vs. BBCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 9.08% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -18.16% | 28.76% | 18.40% | 31.07% | -4.49% | 21.75% |
BBCPX Bridge Builder Core Plus Bond Fund | 0.03% | 8.97% | 2.28% | 6.58% | -13.24% | -0.29% | 9.27% | 9.31% | 0.34% | 4.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVV and BBCPX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.03 |
Over the past year, IVV and BBCPX have become more correlated (0.35) than their long-term average of 0.03, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVV vs. BBCPX — Risk / Return Rank
IVV
BBCPX
IVV vs. BBCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and Bridge Builder Core Plus Bond Fund (BBCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IVV | BBCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.24 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | 1.68 | +1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.43 | 4.88 | +7.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IVV vs. BBCPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVV drawdown since its inception was -55.25%, which is greater than BBCPX's maximum drawdown of -18.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVV and BBCPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVV | BBCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.25% | -18.25% | -37.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.89% | -3.41% | -5.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.75% | -6.19% | -12.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.53% | -18.25% | -6.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.90% | -18.25% | -15.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.35% | -1.55% | -0.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.77% | -3.78% | -6.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 1.15% | +0.82% |
Volatility
IVV vs. BBCPX - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) has a higher volatility of 4.37% compared to Bridge Builder Core Plus Bond Fund (BBCPX) at 1.62%. This indicates that IVV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVV | BBCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.37% | 1.62% | +2.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.59% | 3.30% | +6.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.28% | 4.38% | +7.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 6.01% | +10.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.08% | 4.90% | +13.18% |
IVV vs. BBCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVV has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than BBCPX's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IVV vs. BBCPX - Dividend Comparison
IVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than BBCPX's 4.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBCPX Bridge Builder Core Plus Bond Fund | 4.51% | 4.79% | 4.93% | 4.12% | 2.96% | 2.39% | 4.70% | 5.00% | 3.47% | 2.71% | 0.64% | 0.00% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.08% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVV and BBCPX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IVV has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to BBCPX (1.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVV dropped -55.25% vs BBCPX's -18.25%.
IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVV and BBCPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer