PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVV vs. ACWI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVV vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVV achieves a 10.85% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI's 12.13% return. Over the past 10 years, IVV has outperformed ACWI with an annualized return of 15.54%, while ACWI has yielded a comparatively lower 12.85% annualized return.


IVV

1D
-0.76%
1M
4.97%
YTD
10.85%
6M
10.87%
1Y
28.00%
3Y*
22.43%
5Y*
13.88%
10Y*
15.54%

ACWI

1D
-0.83%
1M
5.28%
YTD
12.13%
6M
12.96%
1Y
29.18%
3Y*
21.15%
5Y*
11.28%
10Y*
12.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVV vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
10.85%17.85%24.93%26.31%-18.16%28.76%18.40%31.07%-4.49%21.75%
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
12.13%22.41%17.45%22.27%-18.39%18.66%16.34%26.59%-9.19%24.33%

Correlation

The correlation between IVV and ACWI is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2008

0.94

The correlation between IVV and ACWI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

IVV vs. ACWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVV
ACWI

Technology

35.6%
29.4%

Financial Services

11.8%
16.1%

Communication Services

11.2%
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
9.3%

Healthcare

8.5%
8.1%

Industrials

8.3%
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
5.0%

Energy

3.5%
4.2%

Utilities

2.4%
2.6%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.8%

Basic Materials

1.8%
3.7%

Technology

IVV
35.6%
ACWI
29.4%

Financial Services

IVV
11.8%
ACWI
16.1%

Communication Services

IVV
11.2%
ACWI
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

IVV
10.1%
ACWI
9.3%

Healthcare

IVV
8.5%
ACWI
8.1%

Industrials

IVV
8.3%
ACWI
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

IVV
4.9%
ACWI
5.0%

Energy

IVV
3.5%
ACWI
4.2%

Utilities

IVV
2.4%
ACWI
2.6%

Real Estate

IVV
1.9%
ACWI
1.8%

Basic Materials

IVV
1.8%
ACWI
3.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVV vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

ACWI
ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVV vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IVVACWIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.41

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

3.01

+0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.71

13.53

+1.18

IVV vs. ACWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVV Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the ACWI Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVV and ACWI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IVVACWIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

2.29

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.71

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

0.75

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.43

+0.03

Drawdowns

IVV vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVV drawdown since its inception was -55.25%, roughly equal to the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVV and ACWI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVVACWIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.25%

-56.00%

+0.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-9.73%

+0.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.75%

-16.55%

-2.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.53%

-26.42%

+1.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.90%

-33.53%

-0.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

-0.83%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.78%

-8.61%

-2.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

2.16%

-0.25%

Volatility

IVV vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is 2.87%, while iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) has a volatility of 3.93%. This indicates that IVV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVVACWIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

3.93%

-1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.90%

10.29%

-1.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.80%

12.78%

-0.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.88%

16.05%

+0.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.05%

17.11%

+0.94%

IVV vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVV has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

IVV vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison

IVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than ACWI's 1.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
1.38%1.55%1.70%1.88%1.79%1.71%1.43%2.33%2.18%1.94%2.19%2.56%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
1.06%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, IVV and ACWI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ACWI has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to IVV (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVV dropped -55.25% vs ACWI's -56.00%.

On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.54% vs 12.85% for ACWI. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.54% return vs 12.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWI.

ACWI has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 1.06% for IVV.

IVV is categorized as S&P 500, while ACWI is Global Equities. IVV tracks S&P 500 Index, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for IVV and 0.32% for ACWI.

IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVV and ACWI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer