PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVV vs. ACWI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVV vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IVV having a 13.72% return and ACWI slightly higher at 14.26%. Over the past 10 years, IVV has outperformed ACWI with an annualized return of 15.35%, while ACWI has yielded a comparatively lower 12.70% annualized return.


IVV

1D
1.77%
1M
3.52%
6M
12.47%
YTD
13.72%
1Y
23.63%
3Y*
21.56%
5Y*
13.38%
10Y*
15.35%
ALL TIME*
8.58%

ACWI

1D
1.70%
1M
2.87%
6M
11.09%
YTD
14.26%
1Y
25.29%
3Y*
20.43%
5Y*
11.19%
10Y*
12.70%
ALL TIME*
8.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$393.85M$471.51M$504.89M
$3.45B$3.28B$5.84B

IVV vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
13.72%17.85%24.93%26.31%-18.16%28.76%18.40%31.07%-4.49%21.75%
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
14.26%22.41%17.45%22.27%-18.39%18.66%16.34%26.59%-9.19%24.33%

Correlation

The correlation between IVV and ACWI is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2008

0.94

The correlation between IVV and ACWI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

IVV vs. ACWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVV
ACWI

Technology

37.2%
32.7%

Financial Services

12.5%
16.0%

Communication Services

9.6%
8.0%

Healthcare

9.4%
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
8.7%

Industrials

7.9%
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
4.7%

Energy

3.3%
3.6%

Utilities

2.6%
2.4%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.6%

Basic Materials

1.8%
3.4%

Technology

IVV
37.2%
ACWI
32.7%

Financial Services

IVV
12.5%
ACWI
16.0%

Communication Services

IVV
9.6%
ACWI
8.0%

Healthcare

IVV
9.4%
ACWI
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

IVV
8.9%
ACWI
8.7%

Industrials

IVV
7.9%
ACWI
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

IVV
4.8%
ACWI
4.7%

Energy

IVV
3.3%
ACWI
3.6%

Utilities

IVV
2.6%
ACWI
2.4%

Real Estate

IVV
1.9%
ACWI
1.6%

Basic Materials

IVV
1.8%
ACWI
3.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVV vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

ACWI
ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IVV vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IVVACWIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.33

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

2.61

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.38

10.90

+0.47

IVV vs. ACWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVV Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the ACWI Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVV and ACWI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IVV vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVV drawdown since its inception was -55.25%, roughly equal to the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVV and ACWI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVVACWIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.25%

-56.00%

+0.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-9.73%

+0.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.75%

-16.55%

-2.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.53%

-26.42%

+1.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.90%

-33.53%

-0.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.72%

-8.55%

-2.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

2.33%

-0.25%

Volatility

IVV vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is 4.10%, while iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) has a volatility of 4.32%. This indicates that IVV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVVACWIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.10%

4.32%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.39%

11.81%

-1.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.96%

14.06%

-1.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.04%

16.25%

+0.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.08%

17.08%

+1.00%

IVV vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVV has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

IVV vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison

IVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than ACWI's 1.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
1.40%1.55%1.70%1.88%1.79%1.71%1.43%2.33%2.18%1.94%2.19%2.56%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
1.06%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, IVV and ACWI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ACWI has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to IVV (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVV dropped -55.25% vs ACWI's -56.00%.

On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.35% vs 12.70% for ACWI. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 4.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.35% return vs 12.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWI.

ACWI has the higher dividend yield at 1.40%, compared with 1.06% for IVV.

IVV is categorized as S&P 500, while ACWI is Global Equities. IVV tracks S&P 500 Index, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for IVV and 0.32% for ACWI.

IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVV and ACWI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer