PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IVV.AX vs. IEM.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IVV.AX vs. IEM.AX

Last updated Jul 18, 2026
Documentation

IVV.AX (iShares S&P 500 ETF) and IEM.AX (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (AU)) are both exchange-traded funds - IVV.AX is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Net TR Index (AUD), while IEM.AX is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IVV.AX returned 109.77%/yr vs 8.49%/yr for IEM.AX. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

IVV.AX vs. IEM.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 ETF (IVV.AX) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (AU) (IEM.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVV.AX achieves a 4.48% return, which is significantly lower than IEM.AX's 10.38% return. Over the past 10 years, IVV.AX has outperformed IEM.AX with an annualized return of 109.77%, while IEM.AX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.49% annualized return.

IVV.AX

1D
-1.19%
1M
0.28%
6M
3.46%
YTD
4.48%
1Y
11.47%
3Y*
18.48%
5Y*
95.38%
10Y*
109.77%

IEM.AX

1D
-4.00%
1M
-9.12%
6M
3.79%
YTD
10.38%
1Y
20.26%
3Y*
15.74%
5Y*
6.08%
10Y*
8.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVV.AX vs. IEM.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IVV.AX
iShares S&P 500 ETF		4.48%9.09%37.10%25.77%1,137.93%2,933.38%11.30%62.34%3.21%10.85%
IEM.AX
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (AU)		10.38%22.71%14.85%6.42%-13.41%1.75%7.24%17.26%-5.17%26.57%

Correlation

The correlation between IVV.AX and IEM.AX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2007

0.51

The correlation between IVV.AX and IEM.AX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.41 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares S&P 500 ETF

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (AU)

Often compared with IVV.AX:
IVV.AX vs. IVVIVV.AX vs. IOZ.AXIVV.AX vs. NDQ.AXIVV.AX vs. GLDN.AXIVV.AX vs. VWRD.LIVV.AX vs. HYLD.TOIVV.AX vs. AGIX
Often compared with IEM.AX:
IEM.AX vs. EMKT.AXIEM.AX vs. FEMX.AXIEM.AX vs. AUMF.AXIEM.AX vs. BILL.AXIEM.AX vs. IHCB.AXIEM.AX vs. ILB.AXIEM.AX vs. MVOL.AX

Return for Risk

IVV.AX vs. IEM.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IVV.AX
IVV.AX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
IVV.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
IEM.AX
IEM.AX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
IEM.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEM.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEM.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
IEM.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEM.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVV.AX vs. IEM.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 ETF (IVV.AX) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (AU) (IEM.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

IVV.AXIEM.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.07
1.06

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.50
1.50

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.21

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.95

1.74

-0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.55

5.52

-2.98

IVV.AX vs. IEM.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVV.AX Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is comparable to the IEM.AX Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVV.AX and IEM.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IVV.AX vs. IEM.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVV.AX drawdown since its inception was -38.37%, smaller than the maximum IEM.AX drawdown of -43.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVV.AX and IEM.AX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IVV.AXIEM.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.37%

-43.82%

+5.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.60%

-11.25%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.38%

-11.25%

-6.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.38%

-25.26%

+7.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.89%

-27.57%

+3.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.59%

-11.15%

+9.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.46%

-12.22%

+2.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.40%

3.60%

+0.80%

Volatility

IVV.AX vs. IEM.AX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 ETF (IVV.AX) is 2.80%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (AU) (IEM.AX) has a volatility of 8.99%. This indicates that IVV.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEM.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IVV.AXIEM.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.80%

8.99%

-6.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.86%

17.22%

-9.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.36%

18.47%

-8.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

583.06%

15.60%

+567.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

772.05%

15.53%

+756.52%

Dividends

IVV.AX vs. IEM.AX - Dividend Comparison

IVV.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, less than IEM.AX's 0.84% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEM.AX
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (AU)		0.84%0.89%0.66%1.16%3.38%2.36%1.28%3.45%1.06%2.28%0.00%0.00%
IVV.AX
iShares S&P 500 ETF		0.76%0.73%1.12%1.67%101.56%79.67%5.54%19.41%0.00%0.00%6.28%6.83%

Frequently Asked Questions

IVV.AX and IEM.AX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVV.AX is categorized as S&P 500, while IEM.AX is Emerging Markets Equities. IVV.AX tracks S&P 500 Net TR Index (AUD), while IEM.AX tracks iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVV.AX and IEM.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer