PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVV.AX vs. IOZ.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVV.AX vs. IOZ.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 ETF (IVV.AX) and Ishares Core S&P/ASX 200 ETF (IOZ.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVV.AX achieves a 3.12% return, which is significantly higher than IOZ.AX's 1.18% return. Over the past 10 years, IVV.AX has outperformed IOZ.AX with an annualized return of 15.60%, while IOZ.AX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.98% annualized return.


IVV.AX

1D
-0.49%
1M
4.78%
YTD
3.12%
6M
2.47%
1Y
15.40%
3Y*
18.99%
5Y*
15.43%
10Y*
15.60%

IOZ.AX

1D
-1.21%
1M
0.46%
YTD
1.18%
6M
2.55%
1Y
5.04%
3Y*
10.11%
5Y*
7.52%
10Y*
8.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVV.AX vs. IOZ.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IVV.AX
iShares S&P 500 ETF
3.12%9.42%37.34%24.97%-12.54%37.17%6.91%32.27%4.55%12.89%
IOZ.AX
Ishares Core S&P/ASX 200 ETF
1.18%10.22%11.35%12.19%-0.91%16.90%1.35%23.29%-2.99%11.57%

Correlation

The correlation between IVV.AX and IOZ.AX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2010

0.44

The correlation between IVV.AX and IOZ.AX shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (3 years) to 0.51 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVV.AX vs. IOZ.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVV.AX
IVV.AX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
IVV.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

IOZ.AX
IOZ.AX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
IOZ.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IOZ.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
IOZ.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
IOZ.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
IOZ.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVV.AX vs. IOZ.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 ETF (IVV.AX) and Ishares Core S&P/ASX 200 ETF (IOZ.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IVV.AXIOZ.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.08

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

0.59

+0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.71

1.51

+2.20

IVV.AX vs. IOZ.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVV.AX Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is higher than the IOZ.AX Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVV.AX and IOZ.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IVV.AXIOZ.AXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

0.42

+1.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.12

0.58

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.07

0.62

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.55

+0.17

Drawdowns

IVV.AX vs. IOZ.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVV.AX drawdown since its inception was -38.40%, which is greater than IOZ.AX's maximum drawdown of -35.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVV.AX and IOZ.AX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVV.AXIOZ.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.40%

-35.75%

-2.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.34%

-8.45%

-2.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.38%

-13.35%

-4.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.55%

-14.92%

-5.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.90%

-35.75%

+11.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

-4.57%

+4.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.93%

-4.68%

-5.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.13%

3.32%

+0.81%

Volatility

IVV.AX vs. IOZ.AX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 ETF (IVV.AX) is 2.02%, while Ishares Core S&P/ASX 200 ETF (IOZ.AX) has a volatility of 4.32%. This indicates that IVV.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IOZ.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVV.AXIOZ.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.02%

4.32%

-2.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.46%

9.64%

-2.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.32%

11.87%

-1.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.79%

12.85%

+0.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.47%

14.38%

+0.09%

IVV.AX vs. IOZ.AX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVV.AX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than IOZ.AX's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IVV.AX vs. IOZ.AX - Dividend Comparison

IVV.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than IOZ.AX's 3.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IOZ.AX
Ishares Core S&P/ASX 200 ETF
3.56%3.39%3.47%3.73%6.11%3.32%2.40%4.62%4.27%3.90%4.89%7.69%
IVV.AX
iShares S&P 500 ETF
0.97%1.03%1.28%1.08%1.42%1.04%1.53%2.18%1.34%1.73%1.89%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVV.AX and IOZ.AX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IVV.AX is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IVV.AX is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for IOZ.AX.

IVV.AX is categorized as S&P 500, while IOZ.AX is Large Cap Blend Equities. IVV.AX tracks S&P 500 Net TR Index (AUD), while IOZ.AX tracks S&P/ASX 200 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for IVV.AX and 0.05% for IOZ.AX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVV.AX and IOZ.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer