IVRA vs. DFGR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IVRA (Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF) and DFGR (Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVRA is a ESG fund actively managed by Invesco, while DFGR is a REIT fund actively managed by Dimensional. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, IVRA returned 15.46%/yr vs 8.89%/yr for DFGR. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IVRA charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for DFGR.

Performance

IVRA vs. DFGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF (IVRA) and Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF (DFGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVRA achieves a 11.70% return, which is significantly higher than DFGR's 7.61% return.

IVRA

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 11.70%
• 6M: 12.41%
• 1Y: 15.73%
• 3Y*: 15.46%
• 5Y*: 7.62%
• 10Y*: —

DFGR

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: -1.00%
• YTD: 7.61%
• 6M: 7.46%
• 1Y: 10.27%
• 3Y*: 8.89%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVRA vs. DFGR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
IVRA Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF	11.70%	10.20%	13.07%	9.13%	-1.56%
DFGR Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF	7.61%	7.65%	1.89%	9.64%	-1.24%

Correlation

The correlation between IVRA and DFGR is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2022	0.85

The correlation between IVRA and DFGR shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IVRA vs. DFGR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IVRA	DFGR
Real Estate	46.8%	99.1%
Energy	23.5%	0.0%
Basic Materials	14.3%	-
Utilities	10.3%	0.0%
Consumer Cyclical	2.6%	0.0%
Consumer Defensive	1.7%	0.0%
Financial Services	0.7%	0.1%
Communication Services	-	0.0%
Healthcare	-	0.0%
Industrials	-	0.0%
Technology	-	0.1%

Return for Risk

IVRA vs. DFGR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVRA

IVRA Risk / Return Rank: 58
IVRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
IVRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
IVRA Omega Ratio Rank: 57
IVRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
IVRA Martin Ratio Rank: 66

DFGR

DFGR Risk / Return Rank: 24
DFGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
DFGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
DFGR Omega Ratio Rank: 23
DFGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
DFGR Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVRA vs. DFGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF (IVRA) and Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF (DFGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IVRA	DFGR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.72	0.87	+0.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.49	1.26	+1.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.16	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.46	1.13	+2.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.02	4.00	+8.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IVRA vs. DFGR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVRA Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is higher than the DFGR Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVRA and DFGR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IVRA	DFGR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.72	0.87	+0.85
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.73	0.48	+0.25

Drawdowns

IVRA vs. DFGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVRA drawdown since its inception was -25.99%, which is greater than DFGR's maximum drawdown of -21.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVRA and DFGR.

Drawdown Indicators

	IVRA	DFGR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.99%	-21.28%	-4.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.60%	-9.15%	+4.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.03%	-17.57%	+2.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.99%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.92%	-2.76%	+1.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.27%	-6.30%	-0.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.32%	2.58%	-1.26%

Volatility

IVRA vs. DFGR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF (IVRA) is 0.00%, while Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF (DFGR) has a volatility of 3.61%. This indicates that IVRA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IVRA	DFGR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.00%	3.61%	-3.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.45%	8.75%	-3.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.27%	11.86%	-2.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.58%	15.42%	+1.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.39%	15.42%	+0.97%

IVRA vs. DFGR - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVRA has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than DFGR's 0.22% expense ratio.

Dividends

IVRA vs. DFGR - Dividend Comparison

IVRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.99%, more than DFGR's 3.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DFGR Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF	3.95%	4.05%	3.73%	2.77%	0.59%	0.00%
IVRA Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF	16.99%	5.68%	3.71%	2.47%	2.30%	3.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IVRA and DFGR in my portfolio?

IVRA and DFGR have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IVRA or DFGR?

DFGR has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to IVRA (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVRA dropped -25.99% vs DFGR's -21.28%.

Which ETF is better, IVRA or DFGR?

On 3-year performance, IVRA leads with 15.46% vs 8.89% for DFGR. On fees, DFGR is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, IVRA has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IVRA or DFGR?

Over the 3-year period, IVRA has performed better with a 15.46% return vs 8.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IVRA or DFGR?

DFGR is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IVRA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IVRA or DFGR?

IVRA has the higher dividend yield at 16.99%, compared with 3.95% for DFGR.

What is the main difference between IVRA and DFGR?

IVRA is categorized as ESG, while DFGR is REIT. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for IVRA and 0.22% for DFGR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IVRA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.