IVOL vs. KMLM
IVOL (Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF) and KMLM (KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVOL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund actively managed by CICC, while KMLM is a Systematic Trend fund tracking the KFA MLM Index. IVOL is actively managed, while KMLM is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IVOL returned -5.56%/yr vs 5.56%/yr for KMLM. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. IVOL charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for KMLM.
Performance
IVOL vs. KMLM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVOL achieves a -7.64% return, which is significantly lower than KMLM's 11.60% return.
IVOL
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -1.01%
- 6M
- -6.37%
- YTD
- -7.64%
- 1Y
- -7.79%
- 3Y*
- -2.49%
- 5Y*
- -5.56%
- 10Y*
- —
KMLM
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 4.38%
- 6M
- 8.95%
- YTD
- 11.60%
- 1Y
- 14.25%
- 3Y*
- -0.51%
- 5Y*
- 5.56%
- 10Y*
- —
IVOL vs. KMLM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOL Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF | -7.64% | 11.97% | -11.07% | -5.18% | -12.69% | -0.31% | 1.98% |
KMLM KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF | 11.60% | -2.98% | -1.69% | -5.66% | 30.61% | 7.04% | 5.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVOL and KMLM is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2020 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVOL vs. KMLM — Risk / Return Rank
IVOL
KMLM
IVOL vs. KMLM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IVOL) and KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IVOL | KMLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.23 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.65 | 1.49 | -2.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | 4.68 | -6.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IVOL vs. KMLM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVOL drawdown since its inception was -31.16%, which is greater than KMLM's maximum drawdown of -27.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOL and KMLM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVOL | KMLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.16% | -27.47% | -3.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.08% | -9.61% | -2.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.48% | -22.28% | +7.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.28% | -27.47% | -2.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.36% | -12.98% | -14.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.52% | -12.79% | -0.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.73% | 3.05% | +2.68% |
Volatility
IVOL vs. KMLM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IVOL) is 2.66%, while KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM) has a volatility of 3.71%. This indicates that IVOL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KMLM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVOL | KMLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.66% | 3.71% | -1.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.00% | 10.11% | -5.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.74% | 11.50% | -4.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.85% | 14.57% | -1.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.94% | 14.68% | -2.74% |
IVOL vs. KMLM - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVOL has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than KMLM's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVOL vs. KMLM - Dividend Comparison
IVOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, less than KMLM's 4.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOL Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF | 3.92% | 3.61% | 3.83% | 3.73% | 3.92% | 3.93% | 3.44% | 2.02% |
KMLM KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF | 4.50% | 5.02% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 13.22% | 6.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVOL and KMLM have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KMLM has higher volatility (3.71%) compared to IVOL (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOL dropped -31.16% vs KMLM's -27.47%.
On 5-year performance, KMLM leads with 5.56% vs -5.56% for IVOL. On fees, KMLM is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, IVOL has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, KMLM has performed better with a 5.56% return vs -5.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KMLM is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for IVOL.
KMLM has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 3.92% for IVOL.
IVOL is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while KMLM is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: CICC and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for IVOL and 0.90% for KMLM.
KMLM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVOL and KMLM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer