IVOG vs. PBW

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

IVOG (Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF) and PBW (Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds - IVOG tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index while PBW tracks the The WilderHill Clean Energy Index (AMEX). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IVOG returned 11.58%/yr vs 11.45%/yr for PBW. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IVOG charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for PBW.

Performance

IVOG vs. PBW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IVOG) and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVOG achieves a 18.93% return, which is significantly lower than PBW's 54.02% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IVOG having a 11.58% annualized return and PBW not far behind at 11.45%.

IVOG

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: 5.56%
• YTD: 18.93%
• 6M: 19.48%
• 1Y: 31.58%
• 3Y*: 17.95%
• 5Y*: 8.75%
• 10Y*: 11.58%

PBW

• 1D: 3.64%
• 1M: 21.42%
• YTD: 54.02%
• 6M: 52.03%
• 1Y: 170.82%
• 3Y*: 9.47%
• 5Y*: -9.19%
• 10Y*: 11.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVOG vs. PBW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IVOG Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF	18.93%	7.34%	15.62%	17.36%	-19.08%	18.85%	22.60%	26.13%	-10.58%	19.90%
PBW Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF	54.02%	53.96%	-30.77%	-20.03%	-44.55%	-29.86%	204.82%	62.58%	-14.11%	39.92%

Correlation

The correlation between IVOG and PBW is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010	0.71

The correlation between IVOG and PBW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

IVOG vs. PBW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IVOG	PBW
Industrials	30.9%	34.3%
Technology	21.9%	14.3%
Healthcare	13.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	8.0%	13.9%
Financial Services	7.3%	1.4%
Real Estate	5.5%	-
Energy	3.7%	12.3%
Basic Materials	3.6%	16.4%
Consumer Defensive	2.1%	1.1%
Utilities	2.0%	6.3%
Communication Services	1.5%	-

Return for Risk

IVOG vs. PBW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVOG

IVOG Risk / Return Rank: 58
IVOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
IVOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
IVOG Omega Ratio Rank: 52
IVOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
IVOG Martin Ratio Rank: 67

PBW

PBW Risk / Return Rank: 91
PBW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
PBW Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
PBW Omega Ratio Rank: 85
PBW Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
PBW Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVOG vs. PBW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IVOG) and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IVOG	PBW	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.85	4.27	-2.41
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.64	4.26	-1.61
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.52	-0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.20	7.81	-4.60
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.59	21.72	-9.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IVOG vs. PBW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVOG Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is lower than the PBW Sharpe Ratio of 4.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVOG and PBW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IVOG	PBW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.85	4.27	-2.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	-0.22	+0.64
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56	0.30	+0.27
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	-0.02	+0.67

Drawdowns

IVOG vs. PBW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVOG drawdown since its inception was -39.32%, smaller than the maximum PBW drawdown of -89.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOG and PBW.

Drawdown Indicators

	IVOG	PBW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.32%	-89.02%	+49.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.69%	-21.24%	+11.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.61%	-68.04%	+42.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.31%	-84.50%	+55.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.32%	-89.02%	+49.70%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-61.19%	+61.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.88%	-62.91%	+57.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.46%	7.63%	-5.17%

Volatility

IVOG vs. PBW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IVOG) is 5.19%, while Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) has a volatility of 12.68%. This indicates that IVOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PBW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IVOG	PBW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.19%	12.68%	-7.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.21%	28.06%	-14.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.15%	40.36%	-23.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.61%	42.89%	-22.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.59%	38.75%	-18.16%

IVOG vs. PBW - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVOG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PBW's 0.61% expense ratio.

Dividends

IVOG vs. PBW - Dividend Comparison

IVOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than PBW's 0.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IVOG Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF	0.54%	0.64%	0.79%	1.15%	1.05%	0.47%	0.74%	1.17%	1.01%	0.93%	1.11%	1.04%
PBW Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF	0.58%	0.79%	2.84%	3.68%	4.21%	1.71%	0.44%	1.45%	2.04%	1.28%	2.68%	1.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IVOG and PBW in my portfolio?

IVOG and PBW have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IVOG or PBW?

PBW has higher volatility (12.68%) compared to IVOG (5.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOG dropped -39.32% vs PBW's -89.02%.

Which ETF is better, IVOG or PBW?

On 10-year performance, IVOG leads with 11.58% vs 11.45% for PBW. On fees, IVOG is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, IVOG has been the lower-risk option at 5.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IVOG or PBW?

Over the 10-year period, IVOG has performed better with a 11.58% return vs 11.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IVOG or PBW?

IVOG is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for PBW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IVOG or PBW?

PBW has the higher dividend yield at 0.58%, compared with 0.54% for IVOG.

What is the main difference between IVOG and PBW?

IVOG tracks S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index, while PBW tracks The WilderHill Clean Energy Index (AMEX). They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IVOG and 0.61% for PBW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PBW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.27 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.