PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVLU vs. IVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVLU vs. IVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF (IVLU) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVLU achieves a 16.70% return, which is significantly higher than IVV's 11.75% return. Over the past 10 years, IVLU has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of 11.37%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.14% annualized return.


IVLU

1D
0.32%
1M
3.19%
6M
8.70%
YTD
16.70%
1Y
37.44%
3Y*
24.12%
5Y*
15.65%
10Y*
11.37%
ALL TIME*
8.80%

IVV

1D
1.47%
1M
1.72%
6M
9.57%
YTD
11.75%
1Y
23.34%
3Y*
20.85%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
15.14%
ALL TIME*
8.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$36.81M$33.42M$39.54M
$3.33B$3.25B$5.92B

IVLU vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IVLU
iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF
16.70%46.09%6.76%20.07%-5.73%15.60%-4.50%15.60%-15.10%23.10%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
11.75%17.85%24.93%26.31%-18.16%28.76%18.40%31.07%-4.49%21.75%

Correlation

The correlation between IVLU and IVV is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2015

0.67

The correlation between IVLU and IVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

IVLU vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVLU
IVV

Financial Services

29.4%
12.5%

Industrials

17.2%
7.9%

Healthcare

9.8%
9.4%

Technology

8.8%
37.2%

Basic Materials

7.2%
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

6.0%
4.8%

Energy

5.6%
3.3%

Utilities

3.6%
2.6%

Communication Services

3.4%
9.6%

Real Estate

1.4%
1.9%

Financial Services

IVLU
29.4%
IVV
12.5%

Industrials

IVLU
17.2%
IVV
7.9%

Healthcare

IVLU
9.8%
IVV
9.4%

Technology

IVLU
8.8%
IVV
37.2%

Basic Materials

IVLU
7.2%
IVV
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IVLU
7.1%
IVV
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

IVLU
6.0%
IVV
4.8%

Energy

IVLU
5.6%
IVV
3.3%

Utilities

IVLU
3.6%
IVV
2.6%

Communication Services

IVLU
3.4%
IVV
9.6%

Real Estate

IVLU
1.4%
IVV
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVLU vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IVLU
IVLU Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
IVLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVLU Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
IVLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVLU Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IVLU vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF (IVLU) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IVLUIVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.33

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

2.64

+0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.31

11.23

+1.08

IVLU vs. IVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVLU Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is higher than the IVV Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVLU and IVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IVLU vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVLU drawdown since its inception was -41.85%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVLU and IVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVLUIVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.85%

-55.25%

+13.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.69%

-8.89%

-2.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.48%

-18.75%

+3.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

-24.53%

-1.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.85%

-33.90%

-7.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

0.00%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.48%

-10.72%

+2.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

2.08%

+0.97%

Volatility

IVLU vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF (IVLU) has a higher volatility of 4.80% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 3.81%. This indicates that IVLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVLUIVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.80%

3.81%

+0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.35%

10.27%

+3.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.64%

12.87%

+2.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.53%

17.03%

-0.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.39%

18.07%

-0.68%

IVLU vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVLU has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

IVLU vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison

IVLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, more than IVV's 1.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVLU
iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF
3.22%3.71%4.46%4.69%3.59%3.47%2.05%3.53%2.82%2.87%2.53%0.93%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
1.08%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVLU and IVV have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVLU has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to IVV (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVLU dropped -41.85% vs IVV's -55.25%.

On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.14% vs 11.37% for IVLU. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.14% return vs 11.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IVLU.

IVLU has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 1.08% for IVV.

IVLU is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IVV is S&P 500. IVLU tracks MSCI World ex USA Enhanced Value Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IVLU and 0.03% for IVV.

IVLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVLU and IVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer