IVLU vs. BIV
IVLU (iShares MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF) and BIV (Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVLU is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA Enhanced Value, while BIV is a Intermediate Core Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. 5–10 Year Government/Credit Float Adjusted Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IVLU returned 11.09%/yr vs 1.83%/yr for BIV. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IVLU charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BIV.
Performance
IVLU vs. BIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVLU achieves a 10.99% return, which is significantly higher than BIV's -0.67% return. Over the past 10 years, IVLU has outperformed BIV with an annualized return of 11.09%, while BIV has yielded a comparatively lower 1.83% annualized return.
IVLU
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 10.99%
- 6M
- 14.55%
- 1Y
- 32.63%
- 3Y*
- 23.34%
- 5Y*
- 13.74%
- 10Y*
- 11.09%
BIV
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -0.94%
- YTD
- -0.67%
- 6M
- -0.33%
- 1Y
- 4.70%
- 3Y*
- 4.27%
- 5Y*
- 0.08%
- 10Y*
- 1.83%
IVLU vs. BIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVLU iShares MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF | 10.99% | 46.09% | 6.76% | 20.07% | -5.73% | 15.60% | -4.50% | 15.60% | -15.10% | 23.10% |
BIV Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF | -0.67% | 8.52% | 1.57% | 6.07% | -13.21% | -2.40% | 9.67% | 10.34% | -0.19% | 3.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVLU and BIV is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2015 | 0.02 |
Over the past year, IVLU and BIV have become more correlated (0.38) than their long-term average of 0.02, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVLU vs. BIV — Risk / Return Rank
IVLU
BIV
IVLU vs. BIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF (IVLU) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IVLU | BIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.21 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.80 | 1.49 | +1.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.66 | 4.40 | +6.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IVLU | BIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.14 | 1.18 | +0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.01 | +0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.33 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.64 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
IVLU vs. BIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVLU drawdown since its inception was -41.85%, which is greater than BIV's maximum drawdown of -18.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVLU and BIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVLU | BIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.85% | -18.95% | -22.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.69% | -3.18% | -8.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.48% | -6.07% | -9.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.04% | -18.74% | -7.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.85% | -18.95% | -22.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.27% | -2.46% | +0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.59% | -3.39% | -5.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | 1.07% | +2.00% |
Volatility
IVLU vs. BIV - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF (IVLU) has a higher volatility of 4.47% compared to Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV) at 1.35%. This indicates that IVLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVLU | BIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.47% | 1.35% | +3.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.48% | 2.93% | +9.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.33% | 4.00% | +11.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.52% | 6.40% | +10.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.67% | 5.51% | +12.16% |
IVLU vs. BIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVLU has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than BIV's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVLU vs. BIV - Dividend Comparison
IVLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, less than BIV's 4.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIV Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF | 4.24% | 4.01% | 3.79% | 3.09% | 2.41% | 3.42% | 2.95% | 2.75% | 2.88% | 2.69% | 3.01% | 3.02% |
IVLU iShares MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF | 3.34% | 3.71% | 4.46% | 4.69% | 3.59% | 3.47% | 2.05% | 3.53% | 2.82% | 2.87% | 2.53% | 0.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVLU and BIV have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IVLU has higher volatility (4.47%) compared to BIV (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVLU dropped -41.85% vs BIV's -18.95%.
On 10-year performance, IVLU leads with 11.09% vs 1.83% for BIV. On fees, BIV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BIV has been the lower-risk option at 1.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IVLU has performed better with a 11.09% return vs 1.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BIV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IVLU.
BIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.24%, compared with 3.34% for IVLU.
IVLU is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while BIV is Intermediate Core Bond. IVLU tracks MSCI World ex USA Enhanced Value, while BIV tracks Bloomberg U.S. 5–10 Year Government/Credit Float Adjusted Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IVLU and 0.03% for BIV.
IVLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVLU and BIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer