IVINX vs. DVMHX
Compare and contrast key facts about Delaware Ivy Global Growth Fund (IVINX) and Delaware Minnesota High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund (DVMHX).
IVINX is managed by Delaware Funds by Macquarie. It was launched on Apr 29, 1986. DVMHX is managed by Delaware Funds by Macquarie. It was launched on Jun 3, 1996.
Performance
IVINX vs. DVMHX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IVINX vs. DVMHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVINX Delaware Ivy Global Growth Fund | -4.25% | 17.76% | 17.08% | 19.05% | -18.81% | 17.34% | 20.55% | 25.63% | -6.20% | 24.32% |
DVMHX Delaware Minnesota High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund | -0.50% | 4.22% | 5.10% | 5.24% | -10.69% | 3.07% | 3.95% | 8.74% | 0.79% | 5.97% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVINX achieves a -4.25% return, which is significantly lower than DVMHX's -0.50% return. Over the past 10 years, IVINX has outperformed DVMHX with an annualized return of 10.22%, while DVMHX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.35% annualized return.
IVINX
- 1D
- 3.17%
- 1M
- -6.61%
- YTD
- -4.25%
- 6M
- -3.31%
- 1Y
- 12.53%
- 3Y*
- 14.22%
- 5Y*
- 7.19%
- 10Y*
- 10.22%
DVMHX
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -2.57%
- YTD
- -0.50%
- 6M
- 1.38%
- 1Y
- 3.30%
- 3Y*
- 3.90%
- 5Y*
- 1.03%
- 10Y*
- 2.35%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IVINX vs. DVMHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVINX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than DVMHX's 0.88% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IVINX vs. DVMHX — Risk / Return Rank
IVINX
DVMHX
IVINX vs. DVMHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Delaware Ivy Global Growth Fund (IVINX) and Delaware Minnesota High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund (DVMHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IVINX | DVMHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.75 | 0.55 | +0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.19 | 0.77 | +0.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.15 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.12 | 0.74 | +0.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.69 | 1.97 | +2.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IVINX | DVMHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 | 0.55 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.21 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.51 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 1.10 | -0.84 |
Correlation
The correlation between IVINX and DVMHX is -0.07. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
IVINX vs. DVMHX - Dividend Comparison
IVINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.30%, more than DVMHX's 3.82% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVINX Delaware Ivy Global Growth Fund | 9.30% | 8.90% | 3.86% | 6.13% | 77.33% | 6.97% | 5.20% | 0.94% | 12.51% | 7.48% | 0.00% | 2.30% |
DVMHX Delaware Minnesota High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund | 3.82% | 4.95% | 4.17% | 3.12% | 2.98% | 2.40% | 2.99% | 3.70% | 3.21% | 3.34% | 3.29% | 3.47% |
Drawdowns
IVINX vs. DVMHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVINX drawdown since its inception was -70.19%, which is greater than DVMHX's maximum drawdown of -15.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVINX and DVMHX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVINX | DVMHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.19% | -15.73% | -54.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.47% | -6.59% | -4.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.82% | -15.56% | -30.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.82% | -15.56% | -30.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.77% | -2.86% | -10.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.46% | -1.97% | -18.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.73% | 2.49% | +0.24% |
Volatility
IVINX vs. DVMHX - Volatility Comparison
Delaware Ivy Global Growth Fund (IVINX) has a higher volatility of 6.79% compared to Delaware Minnesota High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund (DVMHX) at 1.54%. This indicates that IVINX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DVMHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IVINX | DVMHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.79% | 1.54% | +5.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.40% | 2.22% | +8.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.57% | 6.84% | +10.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.54% | 4.95% | +37.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.91% | 4.65% | +28.26% |