IVGTX vs. MDGCX
IVGTX (VY Morgan Stanley Global Franchise Portfolio) and MDGCX (BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc.) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, IVGTX returned 7.31%/yr vs 12.09%/yr for MDGCX. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IVGTX charges 1.20%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for MDGCX.
Performance
IVGTX vs. MDGCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVGTX achieves a -8.22% return, which is significantly lower than MDGCX's 17.31% return. Over the past 10 years, IVGTX has underperformed MDGCX with an annualized return of 7.31%, while MDGCX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.09% annualized return.
IVGTX
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- 1.37%
- 6M
- -8.47%
- YTD
- -8.22%
- 1Y
- -13.19%
- 3Y*
- 0.76%
- 5Y*
- 0.60%
- 10Y*
- 7.31%
MDGCX
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- -0.64%
- 6M
- 13.81%
- YTD
- 17.31%
- 1Y
- 32.61%
- 3Y*
- 19.29%
- 5Y*
- 11.21%
- 10Y*
- 12.09%
IVGTX vs. MDGCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVGTX VY Morgan Stanley Global Franchise Portfolio | -8.22% | 0.16% | 8.63% | 16.01% | -17.63% | 21.67% | 13.17% | 29.34% | -2.81% | 25.90% |
MDGCX BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. | 17.31% | 23.61% | 10.87% | 22.43% | -17.94% | 17.52% | 15.61% | 25.54% | -11.73% | 23.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVGTX and MDGCX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2002 | 0.74 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IVGTX and MDGCX has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVGTX vs. MDGCX — Risk / Return Rank
IVGTX
MDGCX
IVGTX vs. MDGCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VY Morgan Stanley Global Franchise Portfolio (IVGTX) and BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. (MDGCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IVGTX | MDGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.44 | -0.61 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.71 | 4.10 | -4.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.31 | 16.26 | -17.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IVGTX vs. MDGCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVGTX drawdown since its inception was -44.75%, smaller than the maximum MDGCX drawdown of -48.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVGTX and MDGCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVGTX | MDGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.75% | -48.25% | +3.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.45% | -8.07% | -11.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.45% | -21.46% | +1.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.27% | -26.68% | +0.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.16% | -34.87% | +4.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.69% | -2.08% | -12.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.83% | -9.90% | +4.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.05% | 2.03% | +9.02% |
Volatility
IVGTX vs. MDGCX - Volatility Comparison
VY Morgan Stanley Global Franchise Portfolio (IVGTX) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. (MDGCX) at 4.09%. This indicates that IVGTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDGCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVGTX | MDGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.72% | 4.09% | +0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.12% | 11.34% | -1.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.48% | 13.62% | -1.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.21% | 16.31% | -0.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.40% | 17.11% | -0.71% |
IVGTX vs. MDGCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVGTX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than MDGCX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVGTX vs. MDGCX - Dividend Comparison
IVGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 68.59%, more than MDGCX's 7.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVGTX VY Morgan Stanley Global Franchise Portfolio | 68.59% | 42.80% | 10.28% | 8.24% | 10.69% | 8.69% | 8.32% | 11.20% | 17.80% | 7.06% | 10.12% | 14.63% |
MDGCX BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. | 7.60% | 8.91% | 7.78% | 1.42% | 1.75% | 16.75% | 3.77% | 1.73% | 4.06% | 34.82% | 0.65% | 5.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVGTX and MDGCX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IVGTX has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to MDGCX (4.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVGTX dropped -44.75% vs MDGCX's -48.25%.
MDGCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs -1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVGTX and MDGCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer