PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVFIX vs. GSIKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVFIX vs. GSIKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes International Strategic Value Dividend Fund (IVFIX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund (GSIKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVFIX achieves a 5.80% return, which is significantly lower than GSIKX's 10.25% return. Over the past 10 years, IVFIX has underperformed GSIKX with an annualized return of 6.79%, while GSIKX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.86% annualized return.


IVFIX

1D
-1.04%
1M
-2.52%
YTD
5.80%
6M
7.91%
1Y
14.53%
3Y*
13.89%
5Y*
8.99%
10Y*
6.79%

GSIKX

1D
-0.44%
1M
2.11%
YTD
10.25%
6M
14.50%
1Y
25.77%
3Y*
19.92%
5Y*
12.05%
10Y*
10.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVFIX vs. GSIKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IVFIX
Federated Hermes International Strategic Value Dividend Fund
5.80%31.79%1.91%11.05%-2.54%11.58%-1.74%20.15%-11.96%14.63%
GSIKX
Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund
10.25%34.30%8.81%17.60%-7.93%13.66%2.59%26.92%-12.12%26.53%

Correlation

The correlation between IVFIX and GSIKX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2008

0.86

Over the past year, the correlation between IVFIX and GSIKX has dropped to 0.64 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVFIX vs. GSIKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVFIX
IVFIX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
IVFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
IVFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

GSIKX
GSIKX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
GSIKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSIKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSIKX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
GSIKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSIKX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVFIX vs. GSIKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes International Strategic Value Dividend Fund (IVFIX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund (GSIKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IVFIXGSIKXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.68

1.90

-0.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.40

2.59

-0.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.34

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

2.45

+0.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.11

8.87

+0.24

IVFIX vs. GSIKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVFIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the GSIKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVFIX and GSIKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IVFIXGSIKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68

1.90

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.83

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.68

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.28

-0.07

Drawdowns

IVFIX vs. GSIKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVFIX drawdown since its inception was -51.49%, smaller than the maximum GSIKX drawdown of -56.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVFIX and GSIKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVFIXGSIKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.49%

-56.58%

+5.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.97%

-11.28%

+4.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.75%

-12.11%

+1.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.29%

-25.90%

+4.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.46%

-34.47%

+1.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.07%

-1.76%

-4.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.62%

-11.82%

+0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

3.12%

-0.56%

Volatility

IVFIX vs. GSIKX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes International Strategic Value Dividend Fund (IVFIX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund (GSIKX) have volatilities of 4.83% and 4.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVFIXGSIKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.83%

4.84%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.34%

11.74%

-2.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.13%

14.34%

-2.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.13%

14.66%

-1.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.79%

16.12%

-1.33%

IVFIX vs. GSIKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVFIX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than GSIKX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

IVFIX vs. GSIKX - Dividend Comparison

IVFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, more than GSIKX's 3.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSIKX
Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund
3.56%3.93%3.23%2.78%0.64%2.90%1.96%2.85%14.89%1.73%2.35%1.14%
IVFIX
Federated Hermes International Strategic Value Dividend Fund
3.60%3.37%4.44%4.01%3.99%3.67%3.62%3.98%4.97%4.17%3.38%3.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVFIX and GSIKX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSIKX has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to IVFIX (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVFIX dropped -51.49% vs GSIKX's -56.58%.

GSIKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVFIX and GSIKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer