IVES vs. XAIX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

IVES (Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF) and XAIX (Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF) are both Artificial Intelligence funds - IVES tracks the Solactive Wedbush Artificial Intelligence Index while XAIX tracks the Nasdaq Global Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IVES returned 37.89% vs 44.17% for XAIX. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. IVES charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XAIX.

Performance

IVES vs. XAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF (IVES) and Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF (XAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVES achieves a 18.13% return, which is significantly lower than XAIX's 26.72% return.

IVES

• 1D: 3.61%
• 1M: 0.16%
• 6M: 15.32%
• YTD: 18.13%
• 1Y: 37.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 39.89%

XAIX

• 1D: 2.25%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: 23.91%
• YTD: 26.72%
• 1Y: 44.17%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 37.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
IVES Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF	$10.92M	$16.04M	$21.36M
XAIX Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF	$884.34K	$1.44M	$1.97M

IVES vs. XAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IVES Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF	18.13%	25.11%
XAIX Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF	26.72%	20.51%

Correlation

The correlation between IVES and XAIX is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025	0.89

The correlation between IVES and XAIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

IVES vs. XAIX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IVES	XAIX
Technology	71.4%	79.0%
Communication Services	11.9%	10.4%
Consumer Cyclical	9.4%	6.1%
Industrials	4.4%	0.1%
Financial Services	1.4%	4.4%
Utilities	1.4%	0.0%
Basic Materials	-	0.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.0%
Energy	-	0.0%
Healthcare	-	0.0%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

IVES vs. XAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IVES

IVES Risk / Return Rank: 48
IVES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
IVES Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
IVES Omega Ratio Rank: 49
IVES Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
IVES Martin Ratio Rank: 39

XAIX

XAIX Risk / Return Rank: 69
XAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
XAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
XAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
XAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
XAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IVES vs. XAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF (IVES) and Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF (XAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IVES	XAIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.36	1.72	-0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.90	2.27	-0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.29	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.68	2.62	-0.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.11	7.87	-3.75

IVES vs. XAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVES Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the XAIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVES and XAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IVES vs. XAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVES drawdown since its inception was -22.64%, smaller than the maximum XAIX drawdown of -23.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVES and XAIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	IVES	XAIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.64%	-23.95%	+1.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.64%	-16.95%	-5.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.52%	-10.78%	+0.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.43%	-4.00%	-2.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.23%	5.63%	+3.60%

Volatility

IVES vs. XAIX - Volatility Comparison

Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF (IVES) and Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF (XAIX) have volatilities of 8.88% and 9.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IVES	XAIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.88%	9.09%	-0.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.41%	23.04%	-0.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.14%	25.87%	+2.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.95%	25.11%	+1.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.95%	25.11%	+1.84%

IVES vs. XAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVES has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XAIX's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

IVES vs. XAIX - Dividend Comparison

IVES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than XAIX's 0.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
IVES Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF	0.35%	0.41%	0.00%
XAIX Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF	0.41%	0.54%	0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IVES and XAIX in my portfolio?

IVES and XAIX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IVES or XAIX?

XAIX has higher volatility (9.09%) compared to IVES (8.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVES dropped -22.64% vs XAIX's -23.95%.

Which ETF is better, IVES or XAIX?

On 1-year performance, XAIX leads with 44.17% vs 37.89% for IVES. On fees, XAIX is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IVES has been the lower-risk option at 8.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IVES or XAIX?

Over the 1-year period, XAIX has performed better with a 44.17% return vs 37.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IVES or XAIX?

XAIX is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for IVES.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IVES or XAIX?

XAIX has the higher dividend yield at 0.41%, compared with 0.35% for IVES.

What is the main difference between IVES and XAIX?

IVES tracks Solactive Wedbush Artificial Intelligence Index, while XAIX tracks Nasdaq Global Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Index. They also come from different issuers: Wedbush and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for IVES and 0.35% for XAIX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.