PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVES vs. CHPS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVES vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF (IVES) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVES achieves a 27.14% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 107.97% return.


IVES

1D
-2.92%
1M
18.28%
YTD
27.14%
6M
24.59%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CHPS

1D
1.86%
1M
32.32%
YTD
107.97%
6M
109.04%
1Y
223.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVES vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IVES and CHPS is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025

0.71

IVES vs. CHPS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVES
CHPS

Technology

67.8%
98.8%

Consumer Cyclical

12.9%

-

Communication Services

11.8%

-

Industrials

4.3%
0.4%

Financial Services

1.7%
0.2%

Utilities

1.7%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.5%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

IVES
67.8%
CHPS
98.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IVES
12.9%
CHPS

-

Communication Services

IVES
11.8%
CHPS

-

Industrials

IVES
4.3%
CHPS
0.4%

Financial Services

IVES
1.7%
CHPS
0.2%

Utilities

IVES
1.7%
CHPS

-

Basic Materials

IVES

-

CHPS

-

Consumer Defensive

IVES

-

CHPS

-

Energy

IVES

-

CHPS
0.5%

Healthcare

IVES

-

CHPS

-

Real Estate

IVES

-

CHPS

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVES vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVES

CHPS
CHPS Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CHPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHPS Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
CHPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHPS Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVES vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF (IVES) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IVES vs. CHPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IVESCHPSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.32

1.81

+0.51

Drawdowns

IVES vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVES drawdown since its inception was -22.64%, smaller than the maximum CHPS drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVES and CHPS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVESCHPSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.64%

-39.44%

+16.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.69%

0.00%

-3.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.63%

-9.16%

+3.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.50%

Volatility

IVES vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVESCHPSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.77%

34.43%

-8.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.77%

33.78%

-8.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.77%

33.78%

-8.01%

IVES vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVES has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

IVES vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison

IVES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, more than CHPS's 0.32% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CHPS
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF
0.32%0.68%1.75%0.36%
IVES
Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF
0.33%0.41%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVES and CHPS have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for IVES.

IVES and CHPS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.33%.

IVES is categorized as Technology Equities, while CHPS is Semiconductors. IVES tracks Solactive Wedbush Artificial Intelligence Index, while CHPS tracks Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Wedbush and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for IVES and 0.15% for CHPS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVES and CHPS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer