IVE vs. MDLV
IVE (iShares S&P 500 Value ETF) and MDLV (Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. IVE is passively managed, while MDLV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, IVE returned 15.57%/yr vs 12.68%/yr for MDLV. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IVE charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for MDLV.
Performance
IVE vs. MDLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVE achieves a 7.46% return, which is significantly lower than MDLV's 10.21% return.
IVE
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 2.24%
- YTD
- 7.46%
- 6M
- 7.74%
- 1Y
- 21.15%
- 3Y*
- 15.57%
- 5Y*
- 10.54%
- 10Y*
- 11.76%
MDLV
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 1.67%
- YTD
- 10.21%
- 6M
- 11.06%
- 1Y
- 19.98%
- 3Y*
- 12.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IVE vs. MDLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IVE iShares S&P 500 Value ETF | 7.46% | 13.02% | 12.03% | 17.72% |
MDLV Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF | 10.21% | 13.30% | 10.16% | 0.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVE and MDLV is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2023 | 0.79 |
The correlation between IVE and MDLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
IVE vs. MDLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVE
MDLV
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
IVE
MDLV
Financial Services
IVE
MDLV
Healthcare
IVE
MDLV
Consumer Cyclical
IVE
MDLV
Industrials
IVE
MDLV
Consumer Defensive
IVE
MDLV
Energy
IVE
MDLV
Utilities
IVE
MDLV
Real Estate
IVE
MDLV
Basic Materials
IVE
MDLV
Communication Services
IVE
MDLV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVE vs. MDLV — Risk / Return Rank
IVE
MDLV
IVE vs. MDLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Value ETF (IVE) and Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF (MDLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IVE | MDLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.39 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.43 | 4.70 | -1.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.10 | 14.78 | -1.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IVE | MDLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17 | 2.29 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 1.06 | -0.66 |
Drawdowns
IVE vs. MDLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVE drawdown since its inception was -61.32%, which is greater than MDLV's maximum drawdown of -10.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVE and MDLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVE | MDLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.32% | -10.71% | -50.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.19% | -4.27% | -1.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.58% | -10.71% | -6.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | -1.08% | +0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.10% | -2.29% | -7.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.62% | 1.36% | +0.26% |
Volatility
IVE vs. MDLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Value ETF (IVE) is 2.00%, while Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF (MDLV) has a volatility of 2.77%. This indicates that IVE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MDLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVE | MDLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.00% | 2.77% | -0.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.02% | 6.57% | +0.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.79% | 8.76% | +1.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.40% | 10.52% | +3.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.96% | 10.52% | +6.44% |
IVE vs. MDLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than MDLV's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVE vs. MDLV - Dividend Comparison
IVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than MDLV's 2.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVE iShares S&P 500 Value ETF | 1.52% | 1.61% | 2.04% | 1.65% | 2.10% | 1.81% | 2.37% | 2.11% | 2.74% | 2.12% | 2.26% | 2.44% |
MDLV Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF | 2.80% | 3.00% | 2.78% | 2.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVE and MDLV have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MDLV has higher volatility (2.77%) compared to IVE (2.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVE dropped -61.32% vs MDLV's -10.71%.
On 3-year performance, IVE leads with 15.57% vs 12.68% for MDLV. On fees, IVE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IVE has been the lower-risk option at 2.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IVE has performed better with a 15.57% return vs 12.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for MDLV.
MDLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.80%, compared with 1.52% for IVE.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Morgan Dempsey. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IVE and 0.58% for MDLV.
MDLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVE and MDLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer