PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IVE.AX vs. IJP.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IVE.AX vs. IJP.AX

Last updated Jul 18, 2026
Documentation

IVE.AX (iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (AU)) and IJP.AX (iShares MSCI Japan ETF (AU)) are both exchange-traded funds - IVE.AX is a Global Equities fund tracking the iShares MSCI EAFE Index, while IJP.AX is a Japan Equities fund tracking the iShares MSCI Japan Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IVE.AX returned 9.87%/yr vs 8.87%/yr for IJP.AX. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

IVE.AX vs. IJP.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (AU) (IVE.AX) and iShares MSCI Japan ETF (AU) (IJP.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVE.AX achieves a 3.52% return, which is significantly lower than IJP.AX's 6.55% return. Over the past 10 years, IVE.AX has outperformed IJP.AX with an annualized return of 9.87%, while IJP.AX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.87% annualized return.

IVE.AX

1D
-1.72%
1M
-1.09%
6M
0.19%
YTD
3.52%
1Y
10.92%
3Y*
12.87%
5Y*
9.77%
10Y*
9.87%

IJP.AX

1D
-3.66%
1M
-4.81%
6M
0.15%
YTD
6.55%
1Y
15.03%
3Y*
12.06%
5Y*
8.14%
10Y*
8.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVE.AX vs. IJP.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IVE.AX
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (AU)		3.52%21.53%11.29%16.82%-6.23%16.98%-0.38%22.82%-3.05%14.57%
IJP.AX
iShares MSCI Japan ETF (AU)		6.55%12.09%15.30%17.88%-10.71%7.32%5.22%20.14%-4.56%15.10%

Correlation

The correlation between IVE.AX and IJP.AX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2007

0.54

Over the past year, IVE.AX and IJP.AX have become more correlated (0.77) than their long-term average of 0.54, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (AU)

iShares MSCI Japan ETF (AU)

Often compared with IVE.AX:
IVE.AX vs. AUMF.AXIVE.AX vs. BILL.AXIVE.AX vs. CORE.AXIVE.AX vs. ESGI.AXIVE.AX vs. ESTX.AXIVE.AX vs. F100.AXIVE.AX vs. GLDN.AX
Often compared with IJP.AX:
IJP.AX vs. BILL.AXIJP.AX vs. IOZ.AXIJP.AX vs. GLDN.AXIJP.AX vs. GLIN.AXIJP.AX vs. IVV.AXIJP.AX vs. MVOL.AXIJP.AX vs. WVOL.AX

Return for Risk

IVE.AX vs. IJP.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IVE.AX
IVE.AX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
IVE.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVE.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVE.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
IVE.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVE.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
IJP.AX
IJP.AX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
IJP.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJP.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJP.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
IJP.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJP.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVE.AX vs. IJP.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (AU) (IVE.AX) and iShares MSCI Japan ETF (AU) (IJP.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

IVE.AXIJP.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.85
0.75

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.26
1.19

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.15

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

1.18

-0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.36

3.53

-0.18

IVE.AX vs. IJP.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVE.AX Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is comparable to the IJP.AX Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVE.AX and IJP.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IVE.AX vs. IJP.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVE.AX drawdown since its inception was -45.63%, smaller than the maximum IJP.AX drawdown of -75.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVE.AX and IJP.AX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IVE.AXIJP.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.63%

-75.33%

+29.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.66%

-12.39%

+1.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.66%

-19.42%

+8.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.28%

-25.75%

+6.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.20%

-75.33%

+51.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.35%

-42.39%

+39.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.68%

-44.05%

+30.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.18%

4.17%

-0.99%

Volatility

IVE.AX vs. IJP.AX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (AU) (IVE.AX) is 3.31%, while iShares MSCI Japan ETF (AU) (IJP.AX) has a volatility of 6.69%. This indicates that IVE.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IJP.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IVE.AXIJP.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.31%

6.69%

-3.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.99%

15.68%

-4.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.52%

19.43%

-6.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.14%

16.88%

-4.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.77%

96.11%

-83.34%

Dividends

IVE.AX vs. IJP.AX - Dividend Comparison

IVE.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, more than IJP.AX's 1.66% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJP.AX
iShares MSCI Japan ETF (AU)		1.66%0.83%0.71%1.28%1.28%2.20%1.28%3.02%1.33%1.18%1.23%0.05%
IVE.AX
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (AU)		3.65%3.54%1.59%2.76%3.74%3.49%2.53%4.82%3.37%1.17%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

IVE.AX and IJP.AX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVE.AX is categorized as Global Equities, while IJP.AX is Japan Equities. IVE.AX tracks iShares MSCI EAFE Index, while IJP.AX tracks iShares MSCI Japan Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVE.AX and IJP.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer