PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IJP.AX vs. GLIN.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IJP.AX vs. GLIN.AX

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

IJP.AX (iShares MSCI Japan ETF (AU)) and GLIN.AX (iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IJP.AX is a Japan Equities fund tracking the iShares MSCI Japan Index, while GLIN.AX is a Global Equities fund tracking the iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IJP.AX returned 13.86%/yr vs 12.07%/yr for GLIN.AX. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

IJP.AX vs. GLIN.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan ETF (AU) (IJP.AX) and iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF (GLIN.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJP.AX achieves a 10.60% return, which is significantly lower than GLIN.AX's 12.44% return.

IJP.AX

1D
-1.82%
1M
-0.30%
6M
4.99%
YTD
10.60%
1Y
20.68%
3Y*
13.86%
5Y*
8.95%
10Y*
9.34%

GLIN.AX

1D
-0.77%
1M
0.78%
6M
12.69%
YTD
12.44%
1Y
17.78%
3Y*
12.07%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJP.AX vs. GLIN.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023
IJP.AX
iShares MSCI Japan ETF (AU)		10.60%12.09%15.30%4.14%
GLIN.AX
iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF		12.44%12.04%12.01%0.06%

Correlation

The correlation between IJP.AX and GLIN.AX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2023

0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI Japan ETF (AU)

iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF

Return for Risk

IJP.AX vs. GLIN.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IJP.AX
IJP.AX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
IJP.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJP.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJP.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
IJP.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJP.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
GLIN.AX
GLIN.AX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
GLIN.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLIN.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLIN.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
GLIN.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLIN.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJP.AX vs. GLIN.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan ETF (AU) (IJP.AX) and iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF (GLIN.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

IJP.AXGLIN.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.07
1.72

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.62
2.41

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.30

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

3.19

-1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.97

9.92

-4.96

IJP.AX vs. GLIN.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJP.AX Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the GLIN.AX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJP.AX and GLIN.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IJP.AX vs. GLIN.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJP.AX drawdown since its inception was -75.33%, which is greater than GLIN.AX's maximum drawdown of -12.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJP.AX and GLIN.AX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IJP.AXGLIN.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.33%

-12.66%

-62.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.39%

-5.76%

-6.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.42%

-12.66%

-6.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.75%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.33%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.20%

-1.16%

-39.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.05%

-2.24%

-41.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.15%

1.87%

+2.28%

Volatility

IJP.AX vs. GLIN.AX - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Japan ETF (AU) (IJP.AX) has a higher volatility of 5.92% compared to iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF (GLIN.AX) at 3.15%. This indicates that IJP.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLIN.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IJP.AXGLIN.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.92%

3.15%

+2.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.28%

8.80%

+6.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.08%

10.72%

+8.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.80%

12.33%

+4.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

96.10%

12.33%

+83.77%

Dividends

IJP.AX vs. GLIN.AX - Dividend Comparison

IJP.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, less than GLIN.AX's 5.93% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLIN.AX
iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF		5.93%2.94%2.60%1.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IJP.AX
iShares MSCI Japan ETF (AU)		1.60%0.83%0.71%1.28%1.28%2.20%1.28%3.02%1.33%1.18%1.23%0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

IJP.AX and GLIN.AX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IJP.AX is categorized as Japan Equities, while GLIN.AX is Global Equities. IJP.AX tracks iShares MSCI Japan Index, while GLIN.AX tracks iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJP.AX and GLIN.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer