PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVAL vs. FWD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IVAL vs. FWD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF (IVAL) and AB Disruptors ETF (FWD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IVAL vs. FWD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IVAL
Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF
10.27%34.92%-0.71%16.06%
FWD
AB Disruptors ETF
6.18%32.00%29.23%25.66%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVAL achieves a 10.27% return, which is significantly higher than FWD's 6.18% return.


IVAL

1D
1.71%
1M
-3.41%
YTD
10.27%
6M
15.79%
1Y
39.40%
3Y*
18.19%
5Y*
8.56%
10Y*
7.93%

FWD

1D
2.12%
1M
-5.85%
YTD
6.18%
6M
8.22%
1Y
56.74%
3Y*
29.39%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IVAL vs. FWD - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVAL has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than FWD's 0.65% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IVAL vs. FWD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVAL
IVAL Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
IVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
IVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

FWD
FWD Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FWD Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FWD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVAL vs. FWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF (IVAL) and AB Disruptors ETF (FWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IVALFWDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.24

1.97

+0.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.98

2.59

+0.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.37

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.52

4.27

-0.75

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.58

14.34

-0.76

IVAL vs. FWD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the FWD Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVAL and FWD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IVALFWDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

1.97

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

1.28

-0.94

Correlation

The correlation between IVAL and FWD is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

IVAL vs. FWD - Dividend Comparison

IVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, more than FWD's 0.11% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVAL
Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF
2.73%2.75%3.60%5.15%8.00%3.95%2.07%2.51%2.93%1.73%2.02%1.86%
FWD
AB Disruptors ETF
0.11%0.11%1.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

IVAL vs. FWD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVAL drawdown since its inception was -46.09%, which is greater than FWD's maximum drawdown of -29.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVAL and FWD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IVALFWDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.09%

-29.02%

-17.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.24%

-13.50%

+2.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.52%

-6.71%

+1.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.12%

-4.23%

-7.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

4.02%

-1.11%

Volatility

IVAL vs. FWD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF (IVAL) is 6.68%, while AB Disruptors ETF (FWD) has a volatility of 10.91%. This indicates that IVAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FWD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IVALFWDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.68%

10.91%

-4.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.48%

19.58%

-8.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.66%

28.90%

-11.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.68%

24.64%

-6.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.92%

24.64%

-5.72%